I recently was discussing the existence of God with a sceptical friend. Some things can't be seen yet we know they exist.

I'm guessing that the response from a skeptic would be that brain activity can be monitored and measured over time, studying effects of different stimuli to induce said feelings and see what the results are. Therefore, because it can be measured, studied, and quantified it means it is a real thing. This is the nutshell answer, I'm sure there will be more to follow as others post their comments :)

Thanks Thparky, you're right, that's exactly what my friend said. But my response was, but you're measuring effects of feelings, you can't put anger or love into a glass, you can't hold feelings in your hand or see them with your eye but they're still real. How about wind? You can only measure its effects and feel its presence, I'm not sure it can be touched per say. I daresay maybe God is similar, you can see the effects of a higher power (like creation) some can feel His presence but you will never be able to touch God and use a measuring tape on Him to prove He exists. Doesn't mean He's not real. :)

I'm afraid I'm going to be that person who tells you that how you feel or perceive also doesn't mean God IS real. I find it more inspiring to think of nature as a vast machine that produces endless beauty and ugliness, and often both at once. What it took to get from a single celled organism to you or me is a grand story that can't be written or imagined, but that doesn't mean it isn't real either. All the small things went just right to get us here, and we're only beginning to learn how.

I could say the same thing, but it's not yet possible to determine the outcome of any brain activity (if we're still talking about feelings,) in any way. Maybe you could determine joy or love by examining the dopamine or seratonin release in the brain.

Emotions... I'll never understand. You don't need science to prove everything. Humans use beliefs to make sense of everything. I'm sure there's other entities that do the same thing.

That’s true. That’s why eyewitness testimony and character judgement is crucial in criminal court cases where there is no physical evidence left behind. 😉

That’s why character judgement holds so much weight. Ruin a man’s character and he loses all credibility. That’s why lawyers are so good at bringing up dirt on people.

Yes and no again. That’s why there should also be multiple witnesses. But then, they could also be paid off...

That’s where you weigh the circumstantial evidence...

I'm referring to the common argument of those who refuse to believe in the existence of a God because it can't be proven.

So? It means He doesn't exist?

You're right. So maybe we have to take it on faith that He exists. :)

How do you define faith?

So in your opinion is faith a good thing or a bad thing? Since having faith in a God is a "red flag"

Indeed.

Oh no no no - people are allowed to identify as something else, with no scientific proof.

For example, I am flatulent unicorn.

But feelings is part of the meme. We give alot of credibility to something that we haven't experienced ourselves such as believing a person if they identify as another gender simply on the fact they feel like it.

And it's considered a phobia if you don't believe them.

I find it interesting that we even have laws passed based on feelings like if a man loves another man who are we to stop them from marrying?