"FRAUDULENT DATA"? CITE? ALSO CONSIDER THIS: ONE, OR EVEN SEVERAL, ROGUE SCIENTISTS COULD FALSIFY REALMS OF DATA, AND IT WOULD STILL NOT MEANINGFULLY IMPACT THE HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF LEGITIMATE READINGS FROM HUNDREDS OF SCIENTISTS THAT PRODUCED THOSE CHARTS. THE CONSENSUS THEORY -- THAT MANMADE ACTIVITY IS CAUSING THE GLOBAL WARMING WE ARE SEEING TODAY -- IS SO STRONG AT THIS POINT THAT IN ORDER TO DEBUNK IT, YOU WOULD HAVE TO PRESENT EVIDENCE THAT CASTS SERIOUS DOUBT UPON THE ENTIRE CLIMATE SCIENCE COMMUNITY ITSELF. I HAVE SEEN NOTHING THAT EVEN COMES CLOSE TO DOING THAT. BUT IF YOU DISAGREE: CITE AWAY!