While technically true, it seems to paint God in a bad light. He could destroy everything and start over, or he could make us machines that do good all the time no matter what. Take your pick.
Or he could let us live our lives and give us a way to be with him when we die.
[deleted]
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Yes, good points all. Personally I don't believe it in so far as I don't think the evidence for God is good but lots of people do. Agree to disagree.
Yeah, I don't have problems with people that don't believe, only those that lie about what is known.
[deleted]
0 ups, 5y
What is known?
[deleted]
0 ups, 5y
I thought you might be amassing what is "known" to continue your argument. But now I see you've left it as a superstitious unknown typical of religious people. One of their weapons of choice in fact. I don't believe you have anything at all that is known and I think sir, that makes you a liar.
[deleted]
0 ups, 5y
I thought all the stuff pertaining to God required faith for there is no evidence.
Sorry, I'm a busy person. What is known is what is written in the bible. When people lie about who Christians are or what the Christian God is or does. Those are the things I have a problem with.
[deleted]
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Like I said to you at the start, agree to disagree. You yourself would have to admit that what is written in the Bible, all of it, in all the monotheisic Bibles founded in Genesis, is what is not known. For Christianity that is the nature of Faith.
It predicted springs in the ocean before science and a bunch of others. It doesn't conflict with science either, though its not meant as a science book.
[deleted]
0 ups, 5y
Yes I think they are known as hot springs. What does the Bible say about them?