That's a paddlin Dems

Maybe you should at least take a glimpse of the actual document before making claims about what it says.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Unclassified09.2019.pdf

Still didn’t show where it says “This is not an official transcript”.
It says it is not a “verbatim” transcript and that it records the notes and recollections of people assigned to listen to the conversation.

So, where is the coverup you claim is happening? Are you saying there’s a verbatim transcript somewhere that the WH refuses to share with congressional oversight? If so, where’s your source, or are you just parroting some anti-Trump rhetoric you heard?

Since you’ve now seen the actual transcript you should try reading it. You’ll see that there was no quid pro quo or bribe or even any pressure to investigate Biden in return for anything.

Yes! Exactly! There should be a verbatim transcript that by law the White House should have shared with Congressional oversight and they have failed to do so to this day - that's exactly the point of ALL of this! That's what they're saying in the impeachment hearings and that's the evidence they're producing on a daily basis that you're saying doesn't exist!

But since a verbatim transcript doesn’t exist, it’s impossible for anyone to share it.
The only “evidence” Democrats are producing is hearsay and perceptions. No actual proof of anything they’re accusing Trump of.

It has to exist. If it doesn't, the crime is not maintaining records that are supposed to keep the President honest. Which is obstruction of justice.

And yet it doesn’t and it’s not a crime that it doesn’t exist.

“standard practice when a president is talking to a foreign leader is not to make a recording but to have at least two and sometimes more note-takers from the National Security Council (NSC) on the call”

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-whistleblower-transcript/trumps-transcript-of-ukraine-call-unlikely-to-be-verbatim-idUSKBN1W935S

I don't know what to tell you. The fact that this document must legally exist and Trump just sat on it is what this is all about. The place to continue this discussion is in the impeachment hearings themselves; that's where you can present your argument as to why this law doesn't actually apply in this case. Because they're up there presenting the argument that it absolutely does.

What else is there to talk about on imgflip?

The impeachment hearings are just a show put in by Democrats in the House of Representatives as an attempt to get voters to reject Trump in the 2020 election.

That is what it’s all about. Nothing more, nothing less.

For something that's nothing more than that, there's a lot of substance in the case they've put together.

“For something that's nothing more than that, there's a lot of substance in the case they've put together.”
No, actually there’s not. It’s all hearsay from 3rd parties without any firsthand knowledge.

Testimony from the exact people Trump was supposed to use to talk to a foreign power is not 3rd party information. If you have a good reason why the law doesn't apply in this case, call your Congressman and explain to them what they should be saying at the impeachment hearings.