Impeachment Is About to Backfire on the Democrats

Sorry, that's happening to Rudy.

https://trendingpolitics.com/breaking-hunter-biden-named-in-bombshell-new-indictment-accepted-millions-from-slush-fund/

You need a more verifiable website. Trendingpolitics is still under review for media bias and fact check. It might be a fake news site, it might be factual. No one knows at this time. Find a more reputable source for information.

So you didn't bother to check the citation.
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/ukrainian-indictment-reveals-hunter-biden-group-made-165-million-mp
https://www.theblaze.com/news/hunter-biden-and-partners-got-16-5m-in-illegal-money-ukraine-mp-alleges

Personally I prefer to wait for several days on a too-good-to-be-true story to see if it actually falls apart, as they often do. Also Ukraine is very corrupt, so this story itself might be Ukraine making false charges.

Omg.

No credibility.

Zerohedge is an extreme right wing blog. Sorry but a blog is not news in any sense of the word.

Info taken directly from media bias/fact check:
"theblaze" may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.

If you picked more reputable sources you wouldn't have to wait so many days to see if the stories fall apart or hold.

Yes, I did check the citation. The first level of checking is to find reviews of the site.

LOL, most of the ones that fall apart are on main source news like the alphabet networks. I have yet to see The Blaze have a story fall apart. As it is your quote only said that a bias towards the right in story selection, not on the facts. The rest is a description are the bias category and not The Blaze .The actual biases where listed below the part you quoted, but thanks for showing your own biases. . https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-blaze/

In all the fact check source you used picked checkers that have failed based on your own standards as well, citing biased sources such as mediamatters and polifact that has rated the exact same source mostly true and mostly false depending on the person that said it.

But as before you failed to check the citation and thus didn't actual say the story itself is biased.
https://en.interfax.com.ua/news/press-conference/625876.html
https://dailycaller.com/2019/11/20/burisma-founder-suspected-embezzlement/
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-impeachment-burisma/ukraine-widens-probe-against-burisma-founder-to-embezzlement-of-state-funds-idUSKBN1XU2N7

"some sources in this category may be untrustworthy". What more do you need?

Stop wasting your time.

LOL, you need to actual scroll down and see if The Blaze itself is trustworthy on the facts instead of being upset that they do not have the proper political biases . All they list to say that the site is not is 2 fact check fails, which is not a great number over the period of time they have been in business and the volume they deal with. Also your factcheck site cites some as biased sources as valid for facts, like mediamatters, so your own source disagrees with your reasoning.

Also The Blaze does just fine by news guard, which is another fact checking site. You site also get a clearance by newsguard but lists several problems with not list reasons for judgement and fact checking right wing sources at a much higher rate than others as well as the judgement being opinion of the writer.

In all it seems your looking for a reason to dismiss things you do not want to hear, and that's why you ignored most of my last post pointing out your flawed reasoning and misuse of your own factchecker.