Ok, hi Michael hi Sydney. When I first got on this site it was simply to try my hand at making a meme. I did not know it was a debate site. I get touchy in religious debates and both of you have told me not to take a personally in here.
Let me start out being totally arrogant. For my above meme I feel there's no debate to be had it is clear cut. The entire monotheistic situation is a giant appeal to authority. No matter where you find histories and literature pertaining to supposed evidence for a credible source in the scriptures it will always be the same appeal because by nature the times did not fully regard the importance these modern times have on evidence.
The gospels are so entirely unreliable and contradictory about the accounts of Jesus. And I know religious students tend to accept that and justified in various ways. That would be fine but the book itself does claim to be the Word of God many times. The eternal perfect and unchanging word of God.
The writers of the gospels were who, who, who and whom? Are you sure? The Bibles were changed by the council of Nicaea and Constantine well of that we're pretty sure, amongst others. But it was true in the first place? Really?
There were books left out of the Christian Bible.
- All the monotheistic Bibles are a collection of human wisdom taken from here there and everywhere, the best they could find at the time, and a collection of books in their own right, the Book of Proverbs for eg, and stuck in, mixed with a bunch of understandings about the Creator at the time, then called the perfect Word of God.
If it's the Jews being the chosen people. Muslims, Arabs and all the cultures that embrace the Quran, being the chosen of Allah and his 50 virgins. Or Christians having absolution eternal life in Jesus it's all founded in Genesis. All three contradictory religions call their scriptures perfect works.
Not really eager for your replies but let's have it. I guess I started this