Shocking whisteblower

2g3mm3.gif (click to show) Clapping nice meme

no bias here, none at all

3eawsk.gif (click to show) Good Work

The funny thing would be that this can apply to both the meme and the fact

3co1sf.gif (click to show) Give an upvote or it gets the hose

3c9rlx.gif (click to show) You want an upvote, here you go

3e6ufa.gif (click to show) up vote

Thank You, Thank You, Thank You~!

3ff1e6.gif (click to show) Mild shock

If it's so made up...why did they hide the call on a top secret info only server?

Why not release it?

It was released.

It was not. A summary was released.

The transcript of the call remains hidden.

LOL, no it was a transcript. Do I need to pull out a dictionary or do you need a tin foil hat? https://www.dictionary.com/browse/transcript?s=t
"The text in this document records the notes and recollections of Situation Room Duty
"Officers and-NSC policy staff assigned t_o listen.and memorialize the conversation in written form
as the conversation takes place. " https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Unclassified09.2019.pdf

Pay attention to the highlighted area. You seem to have skipped it.

I read it. It says the only things missing are listed as "inaudible" due to poor audio. Nice try, though.

You're missing what's there. The document itself says that this is not a verbatim transcript.

Let me repeat that: the document itself says this is not a verbatim transcript.

That means information and words are left out.

Under Oath testimony has stated that there is information from the phone call not on the summary.

So Under Oath testimony AND the document itself both agree that it is incomplete.

That testimony also says that the indepth transcript was moved to a top secret server by White House Lawyer named Eisenberg once the inaccuracy of this version was pointed out.

No, it says that anything left out is labeled "inaudible" but otherwise everything is compiled from the notes of several note takers. Your illiteracy is showing. Now you are claiming that there was a conspiracy of several men and women, including those hostile to the president, to delete facts from a government document that would indicate a crime that isn't currently there. Oh, and you're making that claim with no proof, and with testimony from a hostile Lt Col that the transcript is largely accurate and only missing some names. Oh, and you're still a sad and pathetic liar.

No, you skipped the part you don't like and pretended it doesn't exist. The other part does absolutely nothing to prove you right or me wrong.

It does not say that that there is any other transcript or recording.

And yet his account of what happened is corroborated by pretty much everyone who was party to the conversation including Trump himself because he will not stop repeating what he did illegally while insisting that it is not illegal.

Asking Ukraine to investigate corruption is required by treaty. What's weird is that you're fine with Biden being corrupt, but think investigating his corruption is a crime. It's like you're ultra-retarded