Imgflip Logo Icon

The Whitehouse posted the memorandum online and admit it's NOT a transcript.

The Whitehouse posted the memorandum online and admit it's NOT a transcript. | image tagged in trump lies,again | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
566 views 5 upvotes Made by AN0NYM0US 5 years ago in politics
23 Comments
[deleted]
3 ups, 5y,
2 replies
[deleted]
3 ups, 5y,
2 replies
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
It's called a disclaimer, which has to be stated because human beings listened in on the call and transcribed it. It is still a transcript but because it wasn't done by a machine recording, it cannot be legally considered "verbatim".
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
It's been verified as an accurate record of the call by every witness, including those hostile to the president. So what exactly are you hoping to prove? This is a weird and sad meme.
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
The people who listened to the call whilst it happened, which is the dictionary definition of "witness"
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Really? Provide some names. All I see is people saying the call was concerning enough to be troublesome. The “transcript” even shows that. Face it, things don’t look good for the stable genius.
1 up, 5y,
2 replies
How about you provide a single witness who claims the transcript is inaccurate? Because until then, it definitively proves there was no threat to withold aid in exchange for favors.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Nope. Made a claim. Prove it.
1 up, 5y,
2 replies
You're the one claiming this isn't what Trump said on the phone call. You're the one who needs to provide proof
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
The proof is the people (many Trumps own choice) coming forward saying the call was not up to snuff....or flat out illegal in terms of the request Trump laid out. You can’t deny the facts forever. Eventually you have to concede. It will happen. Even his supporters being subpoenaed are giving up the truth. It’s ok. You can change your mind.

Like I said, get out the popcorn and pay attention.
1 up, 5y
Name one witness who said the transcript is wrong and missing the threat to withhold aid
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Alexander Vindman
1 up, 5y
"Vindman testified in a closed-door deposition before House impeachment investigators that the attempted edits were to reflect Trump mentioning possible recordings of former vice president Joe Biden discussing corruption in Ukraine and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy mentioning Bursima, the company who had hired Biden's son, Hunter, the sources said."

Nothing about a threat. You're a sad and pathetic liar.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
PS- the "threat" is the act itself.....with or without "quid pro quo" is an abuse of power and illegal. This transcript shows it. And the parts left out WILL be even more damning. But I am sure you will defend it even then.

Get out the popcorn.
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
Except there was no act. Ukraine got their aid. Like I said, weird and sad.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
It’s weird and sad it can go from “no quit pro quo!” To “so what?” So fast.
1 up, 5y
No, there was zero QPQ. There was no threat, and the aid was delivered after a standard review. The President of Ukraine has publicly stated there was no QPQ, and he received the aid without providing any evidence anyone has seen.
Now, If you want to admit Biden is crooked and there is evidence out there in Trump's hands , I won't argue that. Of course Biden is a criminal, just like all you gross leftist deviants.
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator