THERE WAS NO QUID PRO QUO; THERE WAS NO QUID PRO QUO; THERE WAS A LOT OF QUID PRO QUO. OH, AND WE'LL BE OPENLY VIOLATING THE EMOLUMENTS CLAUSE. GET USED TO IT. THE ACTING CHIEF OF STAFF WAS SUPPOSED TO BE USING HIS INSIDE-HIS-HEAD VOICE WHEN HE SAID THAT. HIS OUTSIDE-HIS-HEAD VOICE MEANT TO SAY THE EXACT OPPOSITE OF EVERYTHING HE ACTUALLY SAID.
