Nancy Impeach

This is a story that is easy to understand, easy to see. And, it has nothing to do with Nancy, Bill, Obama, Hillary or any other Dem.

The president is the head of the executive branch of government, which is invested with the responsibility to enforce laws. And international relations fall under the executive branch's duties as well.

As it is, he should be as hands off as possible on this because Biden is involved and his personal lawyer should be left out as well. But the president didn't investigate, he asked for cooperation between the Ukraine and the state department. And Ukraine brought of Giuliani.

Also in the past democrats threatened to cut Ukraine funding to force cooperation in the Ukraine investigation against Trump. https://www.foreign.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/5-4-18%20Menendez%20joint%20letter%20to%20General%20Prosecutor%20of%20Ukraine%20on%20Mueller%20investigation.pdf

So it doesn't involve Biden? In that case Trump most of did nothing wrong. :P

Trump, asking for a favor of a foreign nation, while cutting off 400million in aid, to find dirt on a political opponent, has nothing to do with Biden.

This is pretty simple stuff. Can't see why it's so hard for you to figure that out.

Except that opponent was Biden. You need a victim for this to by anything at all.
https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/463307-solomon-these-once-secret-memos-cast-doubt-on-joe-bidens-ukraine-story
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/436816-joe-bidens-2020-ukrainian-nightmare-a-closed-probe-is-revived

The victim is America. We've all have had our country delegitimized, our elections delegitimized and our country has seen harm, due to this president. If not Biden, it would have been Warren or any other person. The person doesn't matter. It's the act that matters.

That's some mental gymnastics and a fallacy known as a hypothesis contrary to fact..

Still, you prefer to argue semantics. All you're doing is concentrating on anything and everything other than Trump, withholding money from a foreign nation till they dig up dirt on a political opponent. That's the only issue in the impeachment hearings.

1. If you want to investigate Biden, go for it. That's a separate issue.
2. If you want to investigate the Russian infiltration of the NRA and their non-profit status, go for it, but it's a separate issue.
3. If you want to investigate area 51, go for it but it's a separate issue.

You can talk all day about anything and everything other than the only fact that needs to be discovered regarding impeachment. It does nothing to change the facts regarding impeachment.

Sorry there, you're assuming that I'm leaving Trump out of it and then attacking me for an opinion that I do not hold. You're also pushing fake news, https://dailycaller.com/2019/09/27/ukraine-government-trump-aid-freeze-phone-call/

Both cases are linked as there could be legitimate reason to look into Biden.

In addition just saying saying that Biden has noting to do with trying to get dirt on Biden, even without another issue being mixed in, is you contradicting yourself.

Again, look into Biden all you want. You must be ill informed as to how our legal system operates but one crime or case is not judged while another is judged with it as well. They are separate issues and always have been. I don't care if Biden is guilty of releasing ebola to every third world country on the planet. It has nothing to do with the crimes or impeachable offenses of our President, if there are any at all.

Stop attaching links to the daily caller. This is a right wing source that simply picks up Russian propaganda meant to divide our nation and is unAmerican. Sewing divisive content based on half facts and outright lies does nothing to further discourse between people.

Sorry that you cannot see that a person wronged is a necessary part of the supposed crime. Without someone to get dirt on, no possible wrongdoing could have been done here. Even past that Trump most likely defense is that Biden did something worth investigating, regardless of his running for president. Blindness to these two points doesn't speak well for you.

Also name calling sources doesn't make them bad, and neither does spewing blatant propaganda on top of that. Rather these and your willful blindness to Joe being involved even as just a victim show staggering bias on your own part.

It is not up to the President to investigate his opponent. This would be an extremely irregular way to conduct an investigation and is something a third world or banana republic would do, not the U.S. It would only produce a biased result and would have smear value only.

It's pretty sad that any American would think this is an acceptable way for our country to operate.