David Hogg makes the Case for Protecting the Second Ammendment using the Battle of Wounded Knee as an Example.

Protecting the 2nd amendment from what? It takes 2/3rds of the states to ratify change. You honestly think 2/3rds of the states would agree to that? It takes a special kind of stupid to be so gullible. Hurry, pay your NRA dues. There are millions of dollars worth of new suits needed by a select few.

Now your being silly, stupid, gullible, whichever, because i'm guessing your commenting without knowing all the information.

The point is he is anti gun, yes? and would like further gun controls. In fact to the point, he wants to ban guns.

In a recent interview he used an example of those with guns being able to control or rather to kill hundreds of American Indians.
Therefore by using the example of Government being the only one with guns and the Indians being somewhat defenceless he is confirming that the right to bear arms for the reasons intended is still valid. Thereby he is making the case for it's protection.

We are aware what it takes for the 2nd to be removed/ altered, thanks for your superior intellect in the matter it has been valuable. I just dont think David Hogg is aware what he really said.

Here's a link for my reference to what David said.

https://www.msnbc.com/all-in/watch/david-hogg-on-the-changing-gun-debate-68393029936

Who cares what David Hogg says? You are giving him power through meme's whether you support him or hate him. It's meaningless.

The 2nd amendment with outlive both of us.