You just undercut your own argument. You can easily find it with the miracle of the search engine, although it's technically a composite from two different publications, though with the same point.
The bloggers argue it has nothing to do with the Fed. I argue if you read what he says it's all but impossible to construe it any other way, irrespective even of his actions at variance, because he came to realize he was being forced to do someone else's bidding.
So the irony you need to find between the lines is that he's also referring in there to his own lack of freedom himself.