Ah quote mining, oh how I've missed you... not. Also, your prejudice is showing again. I point you to the case of the Muslim bakers who refused service to gay people. https://gloria.tv/video/o6t83fwqnZyn1M7e1SHFtXG2o Did the Muslim bakers get the same level of backlash as the CHRISTIAN bakers who did likewise? (I probably don't have to explain the Christian bakers situation to you)
As for the citation, death tolls have never been a good argument; every cause including atheism has inspired violence so that doesn't disqualify one. To play that game of death tolls; One, Eric Rudolph killed three people, much less than the Orlando nightclub shooter Omar Mateen who killed 49 people (I'll concede that Eric injured more though Eric used bombs where Omar used guns). Two, I never specified the United States. Three, wrong as his actions are, Eric Rudolph was also targeting abortion so it wasn't purely an anti-LBGT issue. Four, nearly every country that has the death penalty for homosexuality today is Muslim/dominated by Islam (Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Iran to name a few).
Why do you keep responding to my posts on these subjects? It's a cycle of "I say something pro-Christianity or anti-atheism, you offer a counterpoint, I debunk it, you quote mine me to make a rebuttal, I debunk that, you slink away until I do step one again." Why? Do you like arguing for the sake of arguing? Are you a troll? Do you think this will make you better able to refute pro-Christianity or anti-atheism arguments?