Charlie Conspiracy (Always Sunny in Philidelphia)

It mentions people very specifically.

That is a non-specific mention of people.

How many progressive Congresswomen who were not born in the United States are there in total?

About one. Notice he used a plural.

I did notice that! What do you make of that? Who was he referring to?

The squad, he likely made a gaff and got that that they are not all foreign born wrong, yet everyone still got who he was talking about anyway.

Do you know what "non-specific" means? Because it was apparently specific enough that you and I could take a reasonable deduction as to whom he was referring when he said that they should go back to their country.

By the behavior mentioned, rather than the description of the people.

What?

I already explained, it listed behavior, not race. The generic description that people point to be make it about race is something that Trump got wrong and the behavior mentioned was how the ID was made.

And it is not required to prove it is not racist, rather than is a reverse of basic reason called negative proof and be used to claim Dems feast upon the flesh of children because you cannot prove that they do not.

The ID of the people that Trump was tweeting about came from those peoples behavior.

I really can't fathom this.

The OP states that the tweet was too scant on identifying details on any people for us to link his remarks to a racist sentiment. So I pull up his words verbatim, unedited. On a casual analysis, we both agree to whom the words refer. We all know he was talking about specific people WHO WERE BORN HERE and telling them to go back to their country. And you are still trying to make it sound like there's something about this basic exercise in reading comprehension that changes the meaning of the entire text.

Understand: it is on anyone still defending him to explain what complex nuance of language we're all missing! Not on us! This is a pretty simple analysis of his writing. The complicated Pepe Silvia weirdness is not required to show the racist connection: it's required to show how it's not racist!

So stop with the trite answers and either elaborate to the level that will be would make this clear, or just say "you know what, the OP was wrong".

And? That doesn't do anything to prove your point.