Google isn't manipulating search results, huh? Interesting.

Yeah when you attempt to search something negative about leftie dems you get shit. You'll actually get negative memes about trump.

Both definitions are technically wrong, but the second definition is better than the libtarded first one.

Remember, fascists are opposed to capitalism and communism. Also, not all fascists believe in a dictatorship. They just believe that the party should elect the leader and that there would be so little "voters" it wouldn't be a democracy.

Mussolini was the Prime Minister of the Social Republic of Italy. There was still the monarchy, so, Mussolini WASN'T a dictator. He was a better force for the good of Italy than the monarchy, that's why he was more famous among the Italian folk than the King and Queen.

For a quick read on the true definition of fascism, I HIGHLY suggest y'all read this book.

faculty.smu.edu/bkcarter/the%20doctrine%20of%20fascism.doc

It is a short read that gives a definition of fascism that is the closest to the truth out there. It was written by Benito Mussolini and Geovanni Gentile.

''mussolini wasn't a dictator'' what's next ''the holocaust didn't happen''

Virgin Google vs Chad DuckDuckGo

??

Just look up Virgin vs Chad on DuckDuckGo.

Ah, I see. The name Chad is supposed to be a bad thing on the left.

No, the Virgin is the pathetic one on the left, the Chad is the godlike being on the right

Yeah, I know about that. I've just never seen it like that before. It's funny cause my name is godlike.

.-.
I didn't know your name was Thad

It's Chad.

Oh hecc.
I'm the VIRGIN!

Im confused on your point. What is happening here?
I dont think google was manipulating anything. They got it from Wikipedia which has far right in the first sentence.
Interestingly, duck duck go also gets it's definition from Wikipedia, but the blurb excludes "far right".

Either way, fascism is a far right ideology.

Then would people who support nationalism and a strong military be left wing.

I admit it is confusing because libertarianism is right wing.
I am not sure if left-right is based on individualism but it also has something else seeing as the "far right" as in extreme nationalistic right is not individualistic while libertarians who I think are right of center are.
If you say the spectrum is individualism to collectivism than it would seem to me that virtually every American politician is on the collectivism side.

We're not using your individualism-collectivism scale. Quite apart from anything else, you don't know what they mean.

Mebbe this would help explain it to her LOL

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/e/ea/I_Borg_Star_Trek_TNG_HD.jpg/250px-I_Borg_Star_Trek_TNG_HD.jpg

If I said "a car is a monstrosity of a weaponized machine that can crush a person and serves as a display of dominance of the asshole that drives it" would that be accepted as the definition of a car?

Why?

Why not?

You're trying to define a word using the emotional response you want it to evoke. In doing so, you're spouting nonsense about it flying in the face of how the word is actually defined. So where does the analogy fail?

Come on! Give it a try!

All of us! The entire world. Your individualism/collectivism scale is not going to catch on in the widespread understanding of left/right.

I'm quite confident that they'll confirm this.

If you are manipulating a collective for your own selfish ends, that is not collectivism, that is an individualistic action by definition!

This is correct. It's what Marxism & Bolshevism is founded upon.

No. Collectivism is prioritizing the community over the individual. Individualism prioritizes the individual over the community. It's that simple and you are so very wrong.

Yes, both got the definition from Wikipedia which was a bit confusing. However, duckduckgo does not have a manipulated algorithm that Google has. Also, Wikipedia is not a reliable source on anything history or facts. A few things are fine, but you cannot trust Wikipedia to teach you anything.

As for you claiming fascism is a right wing ideology, no it isn't. Adolf Hitler, Josef Stalin and the like are not right wing.

If anything, Hitler and Stalin are closer to the left

The man himself in 1922:

"There are only two possibilities in Germany; do not imagine that the people will forever go with the middle party, the party of compromises; one day it will turn to those who have most consistently foretold the coming ruin and have sought to dissociate themselves from it. And that party is either the Left: and then God help us! for it will lead us to complete destruction - to Bolshevism, or else it is a party of the Right which at the last, when the people is in utter despair, when it has lost all its spirit and has no longer any faith in anything, is determined for its part ruthlessly to seize the reins of power - that is the beginning of resistance of which I spoke a few minutes ago. Here, too, there can be no compromise - there are only two possibilities: either victory of the Aryan, or annihilation of the Aryan and the victory of the Jew."

The thing is its seems like duck duck go is manipulated considering that the Wikipedia page says exactly what Google says in the first paragraph.

You're kidding, right?

Wikipedia is far left

They're really big on saying it isn't.

I find it weird as hell. It's like "hey, there's these things called fascists and everyone really hates them to the point where just the mere suggestion that you're in any way like them could cost you big time. Could we get in on that by just claiming that they're the exact opposite of what they are?"