would it be lucrative to not do business with 40% of Americans? I doubt that your premise would hold true. it is a sensationalist argument for maintaining the status quo tho, so kudos to you!
I thought we were talking about racism? With the internet and the interconnectivity we have today I doubt we'd return to the 'whites only' businesses like we saw in the democrat controlled south during the jim crow era. it wouldn't be sustainable and we've grown considerably as a society. the "racism is rampant today" narrative falls pretty flat (since the police cave in more white skulls each year than black skulls and we just had a black president and a black attorney general etc. etc. etc.) which is why you shifted to the "anti gay" businesses argument.
LIBERTARIANS FOUGHT FOR THE RIGHTS OF GAY PEOPLE; NO THEY DIDN'T; NO, BUT THEY DO THINK GAY PEOPLE DESERVE EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW AGAINST DISCRIMINATION FOR BEING GAY; NO THEY DO NOT; NO, NO THEY DO NOT, BUT YOU COULD IMAGINE WHAT IT WOULD BE LIKE IF THEY FOUGHT FOR GAY RIGHTS LIKE THEY DO FOR THE RIGHTS OF BIGOTS TO DISCRIMINATE?