carl, that kills people

False, the most people don't even KNOW they're pregnant until AFTER the first trimester has already ended, that's why the nutjobs at planned parenthood are advocating for late term abortions.

You just showed ignorance of refutation, nothing you said would make the comment you replied to wrong. Now here are some actual stats: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/67/ss/ss6713a1.htm

First: "Ignorance of refutation"? Really? Of course it's not my words that determine facts, it's facts that determine my words.
Second: There is several things wrong with you quoting that article (Which by the way I did a final project on that article in my college "Statistical reasoning and analysis" class because we had to find a widely accredited source and write a report on biased interviews.) So I'm going to break it down into bulletins;

* That article was based on an out of date set of statistics from 2015.
* That research was funded BY Planned Parenthood's sister organization, they funded it do to the first set of accusations of them preforming abortions after the legal timeframe to "protect their reputation and sanctity of their work".
* Also in that same year Planned Parenthood was under suspicion of intentionally waiting as long as possible to preform abortions so they could sell the body parts and tissue samples on the black market, and that they were "misfiling" late term abortions into one of two categories; "first trimesters" and "medical emergencies". However a California judge ordered a gag order on the results of the investigation and they were never made public.
* They didn't actually receive the information from planned parenthood, they interviewed it's clients, who could easily lie since they weren't asked for proof, and could just say they were only nine weeks pregnant and not thirteen.
* And finally, the fact that of all the people interviewed for that consensus, it was discovered that nearly 68% were interviewed in Planned Parenthood establishments, which might not seem inherently bad, but anyone who knows anything about statistics know that you don't interview people INSIDE the establishment that they just had a procedure done in, because it can effect the results. (For example if I asked someone inside McDonald's "What's your favorite restaurant?" Then they would feel pressure to say "McDonald's" because they are inside that restaurant.)

Yep, nothing you said being true would make anything you disagreed with wrong. But nice of you to try a self referred appeal to authority. Random guy on internet is not a valid source.
As per your points, I'll respond in order.
* "This report contains data reported to CDC as of April 1, 2018" Stats take a while to compile, so the age isn't unusual.
* Who funds it doesn't make it wrong, that is an Ad Hominem. Nor did you even prove your claim. Random guy on internet is not a valid source.
* Citation need.
* The info is from the CDC collected by the states. Nice try diverting it to PP with no evidence or citation again. Try checking the methods tab.
* Unproved accusation by random guy on internet with no evidence.

So you counter is basically because you say so, with not actual evidence provided.

Okay, since you have no argument of your own, I'm only going to debate him now. Goodbye.

Octavia_Melody provided his argument, which you just replied to, but thanks for the mistruth after providing nothing more than your word to back up your claims. If you have your on stats feel free to post them.