Yes, making guns illegal leaves a law abiding citizen helpless to defend themselves from a criminal, since criminals don't obey laws. Also, inanimate objects don't commit crimes. Desperate, disturbed, or morally absent people do. The idea that you can legislate the evil out of the world is comical. In my opinion, gun laws are not really apples to apples with the question of laws governing drugs, but I tend to lean towards your point of view. Screw the nanny state. I'm all for liberty, and if someone wants to ingest poison, I guess they should be allowed to. It's a really slippery slope for me though, and I tend to go back and forth on it. What business does the government have to say what we can and can't put in our own bodies? Additionally, should we give the government the power to compel us to ingest/inject something? You may ingest this, but NOT that. Or, you MUST inject this, but may not inject that. Prohibition was clearly a terrible idea that essentially bolstered powerful organized crime families running booze in a black market. I’m not certain of the motives that those elected representatives had when they passed that amendment, but the eventual overturning of it clearly reflected the wishes of our society, which is what makes our system great. We try and pass laws that reflect the views of the majority and when unintended consequences arise or views change, we can alter or abandon those laws. Like I said before, the topic of drug laws is a tough one. Legalizing narcotics would, in a sense, imply that we deem their use acceptable. We have to be careful of the messages we send to curious, impressionable youth as I believe the vast majority of those hooked on drugs begin using early. I’m guessing it might be detrimental to our society to have wholesale, sweeping legalization of narcotics. Where do you draw the line? Do we really want bags of coke and heroin available at the corner store?