Video Game logic 101

But they do nerf it by giving it such a short range.

Well, everything in video games is close quarters combat so they are basically one shots. They need to make pistols stronger. The AR's are good but since everything is close quarters shotguns overpower them. :(

Speaking of making pistols stronger, any .45 handgun should kill in one or two shots.

Yeah but they are hard to aim and also in the games they suck.

In the games they're relatively easy to aim, that's why I propose more power. In real life, yes, handguns can be a bit tricky to aim.

By the way, one of the reasons why rifles in video games take so many bullets to kill its target is because 5.56 NATO rounds (if your weapon uses such rounds) are meant for penetration rather than power. They're sleek, lightweight, three times faster than the speed of sound. The mass of the round simply won't cut it for one-hit kills other than headshots. Even that you have a 10% chance of surviving. I hate to bore you by sounding like a nerd, but owning and operating such a rifle in real life, you learn things from it. What I've learned above all else is that video game logic is bullshit.

Video games logic's dumbness is second only to liberal logic's dumbness, have you heard all those Call of Duty memes? Also sometimes I use the AK-47, and it still doesn't nearly match the power of shotguns. I guess it's only because I play Far Cry 5, which most people think is one of the worst multiplayers. Thanks for your opinions though.

No problem. Thanks for yours.

...Also, Far Cry's multiplayer is crap, CoD's multiplayer is okay, but ruined by its players. I don't know about multiplayer for free online combat PC games like World of Warships or Team Fortress 2 though.