CNN Crock News Network

Must drive you crazy they have incriminating news on a daily basis of the antics of your horrible President.

We're living in a new golden age of media.

I give a lot of credit that the likes of MSNBCNN have been able to cause a bunch of people to become deluded, willingly even... But I don't blame those deluded or misled, because these 'news' entities are slick pros who've been working at it for decades... Golden Age? More like Golden SHOWER Age -- and that shower is on the Public.

We have at least 35 people (Last I counted) who have been indicted, plead guilty, or been convicted and sentenced to crimes due to the Mueller investigation. You can try to twist that any way you like but that is fact that needs to be reported somewhere.

There is a reason most of the media world wide is talking about this, almost non-stop. We are in the middle of an admin that is in a slow explosion. Roger Stone, sitting in a court room today in ankle shackles, is not fake news. That's real.

If you think anything I've just said, is fake news, delusion or misleading, maybe it is you who is watching the wrong news.

YOU are doing a bunch of twisting, and omission yourself.... But I understand that you are sold onto the agenda of the 'Media's' Trump-hatred...
It is the 'Media' in collusion with Robert Mueller, some Democrats, & others, who are purposefully trying to CAUSE the so-called 'slow explosion', or destruction of the Administration.
They've CLEARLY been trying to take-down Trump, even since before he was even in office -- and didn't even to try to hide it...
They have definitely not hidden their utter HATRED, and massive lack of objectivity (IF, you don't get that by now, you are choosing to ignore it).
None of the indictments have anything to do with supposed 'Trump-Russia collusion' (which is probably one of the greatest political scams in the history of the Country)...
Btw, I think there were somewhere around 25 Russian foreign nationals who were indicted(?), none of whom will ever see a U.S. courtroom -- though of course, Mueller knows that the indictments were done just for show (so that people can keep a seemingly impressive tally of the number of indictments -- however unrelated).
Robert Mueller's 'Special Counsel' would not even exist, if Hillary and the DNC didn't fund the construction of a phony so-called 'Dossier' (political opposition 'research') -- ironically, created in collusion with RUSSIAN entities! ( https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/clinton-campaign-dnc-paid-for-research-that-led-to-russia-dossier/2017/10/24/226fabf0-b8e4-11e7-a908-a3470754bbb9_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.8d55735a406a ).
It was the phony 'Dossier' (don't you just love the choice of quasi-arcane terminology?), that was the main impetus for creating a 'Special Counsel' .
Did you read Roger Stone's indictment? There's nothing in it about 'collusion'.
Yes, of course, his arrest is real (try reading my meme above, where I wrote about the arrest). But it was also, deliberately, very fancifully staged, and 'coordinated' with CNN coverage (very likely through an illegal 'leak'). They sent an armed force that could have taken down a drug cartel lair, yet Stone was released shortly afterwards on a relative low bail. Why?
The point of such a needless 'show', can only be to use it in a sort of 'red herring' effect -- to keep attention away from the indictment not being about 'collusion'... It's mainly about 'process' crimes, specifically lying to Congress (and irony here is that Comey, Clapper, and Brennan also all lied to Congress)

The investigation was based on finding Russian links to the Trump administration. They have found plenty of those.

If things were as you wrote in your book above, there would be no reason for Trump associates to repeatedly lie about meetings they ALL had with Russians and get themselves into trouble with the probe.

Virtually ALL indictments are related to the probe. You yourself listed that many ARE RUSSIANS! Yet you say none have a Russian connection. Trump speak is rubbing off on you.

The DNC did not create the dossier. The Dossier was begun by a conservative political web site, The Washington Free Beacon to fight Trump from within. Yes, there was a day when even the GOP knew what a cancer Trump was. The DNC didn't take over the Dossier work till 6 months of investigation had already been done. Steele did not even know Hillary had anything to do with payments to Fusion GPS for the dossier work while the DNC was paying for it. Fusion GPS continued the work without DNC payments AFTER the election and handed it in to American and British intelligence of the own accord because they felt it important enough.

The FBI raided Stone's home as they always do, professionally. They were after more than just Stone. They picked his home apart, scouring the place for information with the proper warrants to do so. This is what the FBI does. That, is why they had so many people.

So far, there have been many lies. To date, more than 8500 since Trump took office. I have not heard ONE from Mueller's office.

*Read the reply below this one, first* (I ran out of room, and added this after -- but imgflip posts it out-of-order)....
As an aside, I would likel add that the 'Media' is purposefully creating a 'Fuster-Cluck' of one political 'story' after another (each one displacing the previous).... To show that that is true: try listing in your mind, the 'big' stories over the last 15 weeks, in the exact order in which they appeared (by 'big' stories, I mean the ones that were played-up nearly continuously for several days to a couple weeks). Almost everyone, even pros, would have trouble listing them....
The 'Media' outlets are very clever, and they know that, generally, the Public has about a 3 week memory span -- anything that 'happened' (or was 'reported') more than 3 weeks ago, will quickly not be easily remembered (unless the 'Media' themselves issue reminders).
This gives them the power to selectively decide what they want the Public to be thinking about, and what they want them to forget...
People, on their own, would mostly have to search to get the 'history' correct...
But naturally, most of the Public only goes as far as the headlines and soundbites -- and much rather having someone TELL them who are the 'good' guys and 'bad guys.... This further gives biased 'Media' the ability to push their own agendas... They have used that ability to condition people to hate; and when people try to think while hating, they don't think much at all (they just hate the 'target').

I'm not being fooled by any media source. I'm using an historical record that's been established for two years that I've found from media sources who expose a story, a President who denies it, calls it fake news/disgraceful, then within one/two days, moves the goal post to say, "even if that was true, it's not a crime/doesn't matter and then a couple days later, tries to put their own spin on the original truthful story the media reported. Time and time again, this happens.

Who's lying?