Often, you can't have both.

ON PORN
There is one activity or entertainment more disrespectful and dishonoring to women and that is to watch Porn. It is bad enough to actively engage in lusting after her as she is made to do things in your mind but it is quite another to watch another woman act in ways that fulfill your imagination.

And the problem with porn is that it assures your standard remain as it is; particularly if you're into very thin women. It is like eating chocolate, and once you've tasted it, you will always want more; but with porn, it is a chocolate you must always have and not any other.

Pornography can easily become an addiction and has become an addiction to so many men.

Worse still, as men are sexually driven, if one indulges regularly in pornography, then darker impulses may soon win out. "Soft Porn" for many will give way to far diabolical imagery I cannot describe here. Let's just say that humans, particularly men in this regard, are totally depraved for a reason.

The problem of Pornography is so that there is a strong case that Human Trafficking grew and became the greatest evil of our time. Young boys, girls, and women are kidnapped and trafficked to placed against their will. They are often abused and brutalized in unspeakable ways no one should never experience.

And when it comes to relationships, If you have a girlfriend or a wife, they will very soon not measure up to your impossible standards. Just as they change in maturity and character over time, so also their bodies. With time they'll begin to have wrinkles and some women who appear naturally skinny will gain weight. If she's pregnant she must eat and as she ages, she begins to lose her metabolism.

And the two categories: Beautiful or not..

Do yoiu realize that the standard of beauty changes over time? Today, the standard of physical beauty is one wearing a size 3; but 30 years ago it was different. Women still must look skinny, particularly in most western and eastern cultures, but usually, it was merely centered on the upper body. However, go farther back in time and the skinny standard is still more loosened

In my opinion, the reason is simple: the more dressed women are in public the less expectation the men have on their bodies. But as clothing became less, the greater the expectation of their bodies. And since "Charlie's Angels" in the late to early 1980's when women shown are thin and bathing suits no longer featured skirts, the standard if physique instantly changed.

Now girls are starving themselves to ill and death in the attempt to meet those expectations.

Obviously in our society, whether in the stone age or today, hardly anyone wants 300-pound women; men in the aforementioned cultures still possess the ideal sense of femininity which seemed to center around the notions of gentleness, tenderness, and grace (which to some carried on to physical preferences). Nevertheless, with more clothing a woman wears the less of her outline is exposed to the eyes of men.

Am I advertising that women should now wear Burkhas? No, but there is something to be said of clothing as I believe there is a strong correlation between clothing and physical expectation. And neither can you deny the lengths girls go through to meet those unrealistic expectations.

5,000

Well said

Thank you, very much. :)