So why believe N Korea ICBM capabilities?

Kim has it pretty good over there doesn't he? Even if at the expense of his people. Why would he launch a missile at us when he surely knows he and his people will be destroyed? You are responding to idle threats that can't be taken seriously just to jerk off to your display of power. shock and awe indeed. Let those who share a border with that country deal with it. Stop insisting the USA has to be the world's cop.

Why would he create nuclear weapons, or even threaten to create nuclear weapons, unless he has a plan to use them? Why has N.K. agreed with the U.N. on different occasions to cease making nuclear weapons, then to later break the treaty and start making weapons again? How much do you think he really cares about his people when he killed the majority of his staff after inheriting his position from his dad? Do you think a man who is willing to attack innocent people, constantly break multiple treaties, and continue to do weapon testing on a regular basis really cares what the outcome will be, even if it includes the destruction of his own country? Do you think Hitler cared? South Korea wants something done about it, including other surrounding countries. But to say we shouldn't do anything when threats are being made, and mind you that these are not idle threats as with just a trajectory change one of their latest missiles could have hit as far in as Chicago, just goes to show how stupid you really are. When a country has missile capabilities that can attack far beyond their borders, they are not just a problem for their neighbors. It also isn't a matter of saying that the USA should be the world's cop, in fact I am against that myself. This has nothing to do with that when the threats are not idle and we really don't know how close they are from not only attacking us with any bomb, but knowing they are working on developing nukes we don't know how close they are from having that capability as well. They are not going to stop peacefully, cause they have already proven multiple times they are willing to break any treaty they desire, so there really is no other option than to respond with a strategic attack by just taking out their leadership. No reason to send troops in and have another 5-10 year war with a country and accomplish nothing. An idle threat would be if I was to threaten your life right now. I have no idea what your real identity is to know where you live to even be able to try to attack you. There would be no possibility I could do anything, even though I possess the capabilities if I did have that information. We may not know exactly what they have, but we also don't know what they don't have. There is absolutely no way you can say that they are just giving out idle threats. He doesn't care what the outcome will be for his country or his people, and to state otherwise is just being stupid.

My reaction when people go on rants about how America should be the "world police."

And where exactly did I say that America should be the world police? N.K. threatened to attack us, and also directly threatened to attack Guam, which is apart of the United States and that we vowed to protect. So when any country threatens to attack us in any way, how is that saying we should be the world police?

You have a good point by the way. You can't threaten the USA without repercussions.

If you had actually read my comment instead of jumping to conclusions like damagedgood kept doing, then you wouldn't make yourself look like a fool. In no other comment that I made did I state we should be the world police, that was a false claim damagedgood made to try to make me look like the bad guy. Nice to know how gullible some people are here.

I was proving that you could have made your point by using three sentences just like you did in your comment to me! But I'm the "gullible" one?

How about you go back and read the comment I was responding to. There was more in that comment than just the claim that I was stating we should be the world police. My response covered how little Kim cares about his people or his country, and that he doesn't really care if they get bombed in the process of making threats. I then continued to cover the false claims that were made about the threats being idle and only those countries that border N.K. should deal with them and why. In only 1 sentence in that comment did I cover that I don't think we should be the world police. So what you claim to be excessive wordiness is your lack of understanding that the response was covering more than just 1 false claim. And yes you are gullible because you were willing to believe 1 comment from someone without reading the entire conversation to be able to come up with a conclusion all on your own.

"He doesn't care what the outcome will be for his country or his people, and to state otherwise is just being stupid."

Definition of stupid is believing anything out of Trump's mouth. Kim has a higher IQ than proud Trump supporters. Let the countries that share a border with N Korea deal with it. Because they will suffer just as much a N Korea when we nuke them.
Kim may be crazy. But Trump is crazier and more powerful to boot and that is way more scary than missiles being launched into a nearby sea.

Who said anything about f**king nuking them? I never said to send a nuke there. MOAB isn't a nuke, and just 1 or 2 of those will take care of the leaders there and have no negative impact on the surrounding countries.

Those missiles that were launched into a nearby sea reached vertical trajectories, that if modified to be at a more horizontal level, would reach the center of the USA. Yea that shouldn't scare us at all.

What actual evidence, not provided by CNN, do you have that Trump is a threat to me or this country?

So no evidence what so ever. Or is it because I said you are not allowed to use CNN? Either way, good to know that I have absolutely no reason to feel any threat from our president.

Well if that doesn't show how much you support Killary (creating a Russian conspiracy) I don't know what other proof people would need. Germany is only twice the size of N.K. and look what they did during the world wars. The size of the country means shit.

Just because the intel was wrong about Iraq, what makes you think we should take the same chance on any country that claims to be making nuclear weapons and than threatens us?

FYI, Guam which is in close proximity to N.K. is a part of the United States and we vowed to defend it. So even if the threat was only to reach as far as Guam, it is our responsibility to defend it.

What does he have to be threatened about? When did we start threatening them? When did anyone start threatening them?

I see you have reverted back to having an 8 IQ in your responses. If you were a fat leader of a starving country, you should only feel threatened that your own people won't just eat you to stay alive. That is absolutely no reason to threaten other countries with nuclear warfare.