Futurama Fry

Why should they complain about Anime made by men for their pleasure? We need female game programmers to make our own games!

You know that the tables have turned when instead of the quality of the game, we care about the gender of the leads and the creators.

I don' t play any games excep the life game. And in the life game I have seen enough of male creators and gender of the leads to request that we have female programmers - the game can't get any worse than it is, it only can improve with female programmers.

Again, you now say that we need more females instead of Better people. I'm not saying that a female could never be better than a male, but if you say that females will be better, you're no better than those who say that a female could never be the better choice.

It's about making the program. The thinking of men is too linear. They are ok for special tasks, but usually not for the big overview. And that has a biological reason: the connection between the two hemispheres in the brain is - in an average - considerably better in women than in men, whereas men have more synapses within one hemisphere, making them the better specialists to work under the guidance of women. But men think they have the overview. And that is the problem.

Undertale, five nights at Freddy's, super meat boy, cuphead, etc. These are all great indie games made by men. What do women have to show? A couple places in the credits for AAA titles and depression quest?

It is very rare that one person makes a game. Games like Undertale have shown us that it can work out fairly well, but usually either a small group of people or a portion of a company make a game. This allows for you to have, for example, an amazing sound designer, amazing graphical artist, amazing programmer, amazing plot designer, and amazing qc guy instead of one person working on all of these and maybe being good or okay at them all. Like I said above, a game like Minecraft (pre-Microsoft of course) or Undertale is astronomically better than a game like depression quest.

As I said, I don't play computer games, so I cannot contribute anyhing in that way, and I do not have the time to check what you said - and I am also not interested in cyber games, I prefer to do something useful. I am playing only one game - it is called the life game, and it is the hardest of all. And with regard to that game I am correct.

THEN STOP REFERRING TO F***ING PROGRAMMING AND VIDEO GAMES

What I said still applies. You don't have one person making an entire project on an assembly line. Aside from maybe grade school, you don't have one teacher teaching every subject. If you go to the bank, the teller isn't also the loan officer or the senior executive. We humans work better in groups, as it allows us to specialize. If what you say is true and females will be good all around and males will specialize at one thing, then I would want to hire more males than females

Also, I can solve 12 different kinds of Rubik's cubes at a fairly good speed, am good at 3 different genres of video games, am good at 2 different sports, and don't use one fact and ignorance to prove my point in an arguement. And geuss what? I'm male.

Sorry and apologies, my comment was made for a transposition into another key - didn't think about the fact that some people would take it literally. Your are totally correct: excellent work can only come out of cooperation. But there is one problem: one person or a small group of persons should keep the total overview. And you need more for this than being able to just understand a few parts of the total. You basically have to understand all of them. Otherwise space shuttles explode and the Hubble telescope doesn't work becaue inches and cm were confuse and iPhone batteries are lousy and ... and.. and ...I am not going to boast in how many fields I have enough knowledge to understand what an expert in the field tells me (I am, among others, a (female) scientist, by the way), but it's a lot, you can believe me, and my hemispheres work together approximately 1:1, as tested in a standard test for this. So you maybe right on your computer game level - as I said, I don't know about this - but the programs in the D3 reality game need an improvement that most likely only women can provide.

I'll take that as surrender. Happy new year to you too

gods fight with stupidity themselves in vain

Who's the god here? The person who's second most recent comment didn't even come close to addressing the other's arguement?

Sorry if this gets posted a lot later than usual. I need to laugh my head off.

Anywho, you're totally right. You need a superviser. But this superviser doesn't need to be good at everything, just have a basic understanding of them. If I see someone do something obviously wrong, I can step in and point it out for them. Also, can people not be their own supervisor? They are really good at their one thing, so can they not make sure their part of their product is of quality? You seem to think that in order for a quality product to be made, a woman must be apart of the designing process, which is not only demonstrably false and sexist, but makes no sense. Mojang, which was a group of four men who made the great computer game minecart, never even came in contact with a women through the design process. They also had no supervisor, BTW. My arguements aren't false because they come from a field you don't understand. Just like I can't ditch anything scientific because I don't understand it. That would be a logical fallacy! If you need more examples, try almost every business on shark tank ever.

Do your stuff how you think (I don't give a damn about computer games and most sicenitsts do neither), and I do mine how I think (I do give damn about inmprotant things for life). Have a happy year 2018!