UN climate change agenda: spray people like bugs

Lol. You conspiracy theorists are so hilarious. And your bizarre theories are cute.

Look up in the sky, pinhead.Those patterns don't make any sense unless planes are falling out of the clear blue. Besides... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o7g9oiyXuR8 Are you going to believe the government denials or your own lying eyes?

You aren't helping your case.

You're right. For one thing, I'm arguing with a total moron. (that would be you, cupcake) Indoctrinated little drones like you are fine with Monsanto poisoning your food, the government spraying chem trails and buy into the myth of man made global warming so Al Gore and his elitist friends can make billions.

Here's a little hint. Normal contrails disperse, chem trails do not. Also, chem trails start and stop abruptly while the plane is going 500+ mph at 32,000 feet. Sorry Tarzan, you're being sprayed like a bug in a "geo-engineering" scam.

I'm just surprised you don't believe in reptoids.

I believe in ret@rds because you are living proof those exist.

That's even more far-fetched. And how exactly does more "cloud cover" make global = global warming. Rising global temperatures (or the lack thereof)should be enough to prove (or debunk) the fact (or myth) of global warming.

Oh, and it was an inference instead of an assumption due to the fact that the title of this meme alludes to the UN "spraying people like bugs", as well as you alluding to "Monsanto poisoning our food".

Here's why the "chemtrail" conspiracy theory is bullshit:

The very existence of the Grand Conspiracy required to administer chemtrails may be challenged on the basis of the difficulty of maintaining such a conspiracy for so long. Aerial spraying from high-altitude would be an extremely inefficient and inexact mode of delivering chemicals to ground-based targets.

Pesticides, for example, are often sprayed on crops from airplanes flying at 30 feet. Wide-area mosquito spraying may be done from an altitude of 150 feet. Chemtrails are supposedly deposited at 30,000 feet or higher, where winds would likely disperse them unpredictably and the compounds would probably break down before reaching the ground.

If there was a clandestine campaign to randomly expose every single person on earth to foreign chemicals, it would be simpler and more effective to put them in the water supply (flouridation and stuff, you know), or the food supply — or if inhalation were necessary, to release them from ground-based vehicles.

Note also that if governments used just military planes and not airliners it would be a waste of resources for so little — if anything — in return, as they'd have to use a lot of them. Using airliners has the problems of why none of the many passengers, pilots, and especially technicians who maintain and fuel them notices something weird going on, and how both the chemicals and the system used to spray them are extra weight, something of concern for airlines because of their obsession with fuel prices as well as for aircraft manufacturers as they'd have had to incorporate that extra weight on their designs. And yet even another flaw with this conspiracy is why there are no screw-ups of the style of the spraying systems turning on by accident when a plane is taking off (Or, on a sadder note, when an airliner has an accident and its remains are scattered over a wide area why there're no traces of the deposits with the... stuff used for chemtrailing, or the latter itself).

In addition, said Grand Conspiracy would require that all of the world's governments, including the supposedly hostile nations that [insert your favorite government overlords] would have to be in cahoots with, would be agreeing to spray the chemtrails over their own populace, since there are very few national airspaces that do not have at least some aircraft flying to, from, within or over them.

Admittedly, this is not a huge leap for you conspiracy theorists to make, which further exemplifies your delusions.

All evidence presented by you conspiracy theorists focuses on pictures of the sky. It is all perfectly consistent with contrails. No other evidence such as detection of chemicals or pictures of actual chemical spraying planes or documentation detailing the government's plan has ever been forthcoming. Notably absent are potentially convincing evidence such as spectrographic analyses — after all, the contents of an aircraft's trail can't be hidden from a spectrograph. Or, for that matter, air sampling, which became so refined during the Cold War that scientists could not only pick up the residual traces of a nuclear test thousands of miles downwind, but analyse them finely enough to reconstruct the design of the device tested. If these exquisitely sensitive technologies cannot detect the enormous amounts of "chemicals" supposedly being released into the atmosphere via "chemtrails", then those (such as you) who believe in those chemicals need not only far better evidence that they exist than they have ever offered, but also a credible explanation of why they're undetectable.

If you do not agree that I at least have a point, than you are too far gone for logic and reason to sway you, and I can only say that I hope the mental institution you're locked up in is treating you well.

However, you do have a point about GMOs, I guess.

It's "geo-engineering" to increase cloud cover because of the global warming myth, not to poison people, dipshit. So thanks for wasting all that time debunking your own wrong assumption about what I believe.