That is total BS and has nothing to do with dogs, or cats ...
SQ 777 would protect the rights of farmers and allow them to succeed by preventing unnecessary and restrictive laws, including policies pushed by animal rights or environmental protection groups. Supporters argue that the number of rules and regulations are on the rise and that SQ 777 is needed to give farmers a way to fight against unfair laws.
SQ 777 would help the economy by allowing farmers to provide food at a lower cost and create jobs. Supporters claim that the farming industry provides $8 billion per year to the state's economy and provides thousands of jobs and that SQ 777 is necessary to ensure the health and growth of the farming industry.
SQ 777 would allow consumers to determine which farms succeed and which ones fail through open-market competition. Supporters argue that the consumer should be able to freely decide what farms to support and which ones to avoid and that SQ 777 would protect against laws that would inhibit the consumers' right to choose.