But will the mainstream media give this even half the attention they give Trump's remarks?

lol :{D

CNN - Clinton Network News

:{D

[image deleted]

Snopes says it's not them. But the give shitty reasons why.

If that is them that shit should be all over the news. :{

They're highly biased and in the bag with nearly all liberal narratives

I've never liked Snopes.

I noticed early on that the types of people quoting that site were usually liberal assholes. :{

C_ _ T News Network

:{D

lol Is it asking too much for a journalist to do its job? :{P

In most networks, yes.

More like their job evolved into taking money for favors instead of actually reporting real news. :{D

Of course not. Not when your last name is Clinton and you're liberal.

In the pockets of the ones you speak of

Sadly, you are correct. Ever since the fairness doctrine was thrown out, we no longer have a news service we can trust. This goes for both sides of the political spectrum. Our media has become polarized, and in doing so, have divided our nation into various radical spinter groups of our own.

We no longer have a free press, but rather propaganda machines serving the powers that be.

No, liberals won't hear this because they have grown weary of not listening to the news from the right wing because every comment from that quarter They've heard always has the, "Where is the outrage" sound. In the past 15 years+ I've learned to ignore those cries because it always seemed to involve some outrage they didn't see on the news. I ignored the story too many times in favor of showing national coverage of this outrage or that.

Your best (?) Bet is to write a letter to the editor But be careful how you word it. Don't fly out of the chute pointing fingers at the liberal press. Keep to the facts. Even the title here, as tame as it is, would send off the alarms. Do as much research as you can: in specific, read the actual emails, possibly even quote them, verbatim, to show you know what you're talking about. Writing for liberal press isn't easy.

I hate this election! Sigh. I wish Barbara Bush was running.

I agree with your observation but I'm not convinced writing them will change their ways.

Let's look at the real issue; those networks wouldn't protect Democrat politicians if they didn't get something out of it. If the politicians didn't have the power to affect things like... oh let's say FCC rulings, they wouldn't be interested in doing favors.

It's like when people say "we need to get the money out of Washington." The only reason businesses give money to politicians is because politicians have the power to artificially affect the market in way that benefits the "donors."

Are you a major persona that can demand, and get, network coverage? If so, forget about them. People still read, and local newspapers, especially weekly freebies, are always looking for content of local interest, which includes the thoughts of local citizens.

An important factor is the writing. You must be straightforward and factual. If something can't be substantiated, it didn't happen. The meme at the top is a good example. It noted the who, the what, and the source. If your letter concerns this incident, then it is best to cite the date, where in the chain of the email it occurred (original email or a reply ten exchanges down) cite the datebon which it was written, and even the person she was writing.

Things to avoid: don't demand "Where's the outrage". When I get emails like that, I do a little research and usually find the outrage is there, but the person that sent it to me was to lazy to research. If YOU are outraged, take ownership of that outrage. But, at the same time, keep your written voice as calm as possible. Keep it Joe Friday monotone factual.

Every small town weekly paper editor wishes he were the crusading newsman like in the movies. Instead, he reprints press releases from local clubs. He'll be happy to print a newsworthy letter.

seriously? did she actually say that?

Google it and check out the latest Wikileaks

I didn't find it :/

nevermind, I found it. : at least Hillary Clinton is unlikely to take racism into action

apparently WikiLeaks has association with Russian hackers. Also I can't find proof that those weren't faked. Well trump's worse though :]

I'm bothered by both. I find her corruption and lies more detestable than his vulgarity. I wish we could start over.

I missed something the first time
Who wrote the email?
From:orca100 [at] upcmail [dot] nl

Yeah I used to be a Hillary supporter. I support neither, but Trump is LITERALLY rated as one of the worst global economic disasters possible. you could probably even search it up. Hopefully next election won't be such trash. Obama was a good president