My point was that the embassy attacks were never obfuscated for political gain. Embassy attacks happened under Carter, Reagan, and everyone after. Boats were hit and towers fell. Only one Admi. Tried to cover up what happened.
Saying the email controversies are the same thing is disingenuous. Bush was never even subject to allegations. That rested on Rove. Everytime it's brought up, fact checker, Pundit check always rate it false and at best mostly false with regard to the comparisons and they are correct.
With regards to embassy attacks, one other ambassador died in 1970. The rest were indigenous workers, Marine guard, etc. Tragic. And worth remembering. However, again, if the current admin had admitted the attack honestly, it would have killed any controversy and thus would have killed any need for hearings.