Obama and Clinton did allow the formation of ISIS. . From a DIA report dated 12th August 2012

You should get a date on this.

I put a date in the title of this one but I put the date on the meme of a remake: imgflip.com/i/18tu9z

I'm one of those people who tries to see all relevant sides, and I have time. So I really appreciate that. Trump has brought some very relevant issues. Even the 'making fun of a disabled reporter' I think was played up too much in the media, but he lost some support because of it.

The media is being paid to destroy Trump and they're doing a good job. All propagandists know it's best to focus on people's emotions. . . not their minds. . . that's why the attacks on Trump are spun to make people angry. With the Khan thing--if the media were on Trump's side they would have attacked Hillary for exploiting the fallen soldiers for political gain.

Reading some of his direct quotes, he shoots himself in the foot. Hillary is playing not to lose.

Yeah, he's not even close to being a trained speaker. He answers hypothetical questions (a political no-no), and he rarely uses a pre-written speech. . . allowing simple editing to misconstrue the context of the quote. Hillary is a high-level member of what many call the "Bush/Clinton Crime Syndicate". They have an agenda and they're not going to stop fighting for it.

Since you have time to research, I'll share some of the news sites I use: Information Clearinghouse--neither left nor right but independent: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/

Global Research-- A Canadian anti-globalist site: http://www.globalresearch.ca/

Michael Rivero's site--he's right-wing and a tad "conspiracy theorist" but many of the articles on his page are good info: http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/

And, Axis of Logic--a left-wing site that does great keeping up with happenings in South America: http://www.axisoflogic.com/

Really? Those sites sound interesting. I'll screen capture this & check them out.

Thanks for the hint. I'll fix this.