A strawman argument is a rerepresentation of the opposition's argument created for the sake of more easily dismissing it. It's not in any way a strawman argument because none of my claims have anything to do with what you're talking about. Meanwhile, you're turning what I'M saying into "You're saying 'automatic', when it's SEMI automatic". THAT'S A F**KING STRAWMAN, because automatic actions and automatic fire are NOT THE SAME THING.
Also, way to talk about fallacies, WHEN YOUR ENTIRE CLAIM IS BASED ON EQUIVOCATION! You know, the fallacy of attributing a phrase to a specific definition, when there are other definitions applicable? The term "automatic weapon" can refer to both weapons that fire continuously AND weapons with an automatic action, which solely applies to how a gun is loaded.