Am I the only one seeing this about Hillary and the attack in Orlando?

I have already done my research and my research for Mississippi and North Carolina only showed laws being made to take away disgrimination laws out of effect when religious views are in play. Nothing, ABSOLUTELY NOTHING, has stated anything about making laws to make it legal to kill anyone. There are always going to be radicals out there, but those few are not the majority nor share the same views as the majority. There are some radicals out there that hate Obama and would like to see him dead, but does that mean all haters of Obama want to see that? No.

You want to talk about "while you sat back and put your fingers in your ears", how about when Christians stated that poligomy was going to be next on the fight to make legal, or even old marrying underage, and people like you stated that would never happen. Well it did take place. In fact the very arguments we said would be used (using the same claims that homosexuals used in the 70s and 80s about being born that way) has been used in arguments to try to make it legal. Or how about how we stated that allowing men who claim the identify as a woman to use the women's restroom and locker rooms would result in attacks on innocent women and girls, but people like you stated we are only trying to use fear to discriminate against another group that makes up less than 1% of the population. I stated back when Prop 8 first came out that churches and pastors would be sued while people like you stated that would never happen. It hasn't been people like me who have their fingers in their ears, it is people like you, the same people who want to force your beliefs and your way of life onto Christians to force them to change their religious views to accept others and sin as being ok. Like I have stated before, there are thousands of options for every service imaginable out there, not all of them are ran by Christians. So why not allow Christians to live their lives with their beliefs and not force them to do something that goes against their beliefs when their are other options available? Tolerance goes both ways, and you can't claim the LGBT community is being tolerant when they are forcing Christians to do what is against their beliefs.

Being a Christian is more than just having religious views, it is living our lives by those views. No we are not perfect and we fall short of the mark of those views, but that isn't always on purpose. Sometimes it just happens, but that doesn't mean we should do what we see as wrong on purpose just to please someone else. We never tried to change the LGBT community, but the LGBT community is constantly trying to change us. That is called intolerance by the very definition of the word.

So in other words, the LGBT community needs their own definition of words in order to have their arguments hold any water? Sounds just like the scientific community towards religion when it comes to evolution, big bang, and other theories. The definition of tolerance is "the ability or willingness to tolerate something, in particular the existence of opinions or behavior that one does not necessarily agree with.". Christians showed tolerance by stating we are not trying to tell them they can't be gay, in fact many of us don't care what they do behind closed doors. However the response has been to throw their lifestyle into our faces, telling us we are required to accept their lifestyle choice, and the only way to show that we accept it is to change our religious views and practices to do whatever they want or get sued. In other words the LGBT have not been willing to tolerate our opinions or beliefs and expect us to change to fit their needs and beliefs. Marriage was not created by the government, it has always been a religious practice. The government only came in and started giving benefits to married couples because the government saw the benefits of what married couples bring to the community. It is these benefits that the LGBT claimed to be fighting for, although I see that as a lie because instead of changing civil unions which were made legal for them, they wanted to change marriage. By changing marriage, that now gives them more freedom to sue for discrimination when a group or individual wants to choose to live their life and what work they do based off of their religious beliefs.

See what you don't realize is that wanting to keep marriage a religious practice, religious based adoption agencies not wanting to provide for same-sex couples, other businesses not wanting to provide services for same-sex marriage doesn't change the lifestyle that the LGBT community is already living, nor does it take away from them getting services by other means. So their rights are not being taken away with any of this. However the religious beliefs of a Christian is the core of their life. You tell us that we can't practice our religious beliefs from 7:00 am to 6:00 pm to provide services for someone else, that is taking away more than one right. That is altering our lives, telling us how we should live our lives, essentially telling us it should be illegal to be Christians.

If Christians had as much power as you claim, same-sex marriage would never have been legalized on the federal level, men would not be allowed to openly walk into the women's restroom, a Christian business owner would be allowed to refuse services to anyone without risking getting sued. But none of that is true, is it.

Why are you afraid to address the point that there are thousands of options for ever service out there, many of which are not run by Christians, which means it shouldn't effect the LGBT community for religious people to refuse services baswd off of their beliefs. I think it is because you know it is a valid point and destroys the entire argument of the laws that are being passed in Mississippi and North Carolina. It also shows the intolerance of the LGBT community for not wanting religious people to practice their religious beliefs unless it complies with the beliefs of the LGBT community as well. Once again, this shows who is forcing their beliefs on who, and you are afraid to admit it.

I am done replying to your bullshit reponses. You have refused to provide evidence for your claims, make bold-faced lies, manipulate information, and I am just done with it. There is absolutely no valid reason why someone shouldn't be allowed to refuse services because of religious or personal beliefs, and you know it. with the multitude of options out there to get the same service, why force someone to do what they don't want to do just for your convinence?

"To not impose on Christian belief legally would be insane..." WHAT??!?!?? Haven't you ever heard of the FIRST AMENDMENT???

Let me get this straight... You're basically saying that ALL Christians want to kill LGBTs because you heard ONE say so? That's as dumb as saying ALL Muslims are terrorists. IT'S SIMPLY NOT TRUE.

Now who's the bigot?