Captain Picard Facepalm

No, actually female circumcision includes merely removing the clitoral hood, and it was legal in the USA until 1997. Cutting children's genitals is WRONG period.

"I will speak out against MGM because just like those innocent baby boys my prepuce has been removed. Can I orgasm? Yes I can. Within about sixty seconds of sexual contact I orgasm. Sounds good right? WRONG. After I orgasm I experience oversensitive raw pain for the duration of the sexual contact. There is no hood to protect my clitoris. I may very well be the only woman out there who is looking for a partner who is a "one minute wonder" to spend the rest of my life with. Even now, years later, clothing, undergarments, contact... all of these irritate my overexposed clitoris. I also have to deal with the fact that if I choose to have a new sexual partner I will deal with the inevitable comments and questions which leave me feeling unattractive and just plain wrong down there."

https://sites.google.com/site/completebaby/female

Hoping to be helpful, I Googled "medical recommendation circumcision"...
https://www.google.com/#q=medical+recommendation+circumcision

There seem to be doctors being very vocal about both sides of the issue, but even the ones in favor of circumcision say, "... however, existing scientific evidence is not sufficient to recommend routine circumcision. Therefore, because the procedure is not essential to a child's current well-being, we recommend that the decision to circumcise is one best made by parents in consultation with their pediatrician, taking into account what is in the best interests of the child, including medical, religious, cultural, and ethnic traditions. "

Since when is surgery acceptable simply for religious, cultural and ethnic traditions though? These are the same reasons supported for female circumcision, and most westerners oppose it when it's a female child. It's not medical either. The p**is is healthy in a newborn just like the vulva is, and there is no reason to cut part of it off.

The main problem is that the male equivalent of the "female circumcision" would be to cut off the p**is entirely, since they are removing the clitoris. For a female anatomy analogue, true circumcision would entail only removing the hood.

I reckoned that men who had been circumcised as adults would be able to shed some light on the subject, so I Googled "opinions of men who were circumcised as adults"...
https://www.google.com/#q=opinions+of+men+who+were+circumcised+as+adults

Apparently, there are no neutral sites that have both sides of this. Either the site is exclusively positive or exclusively negative, so it's impossible to get a percentage comparison.