Creepy Condescending Wonka

I feel fine. I identify as a woman, they identify as a woman, anyone can get changed next to me or use the cubicle next to me in toilet as long as they feel they're in the locker room or toilet they should be in, just like I do. If I was worried about getting checked out in the locker rooms, I wouldn't use them because any lesbian who wants to can stare at me while I undress.

Do you have any kids? Do you honestly think they would be comfortable with some man walking in on them changing? Do you honestly feel comfortable with a man walking in on you not knowing for a fact that the man that just walked in actually identifies as a woman? Should the minority actually control how the majority feel? I honestly wouldn't feel comfortable having some woman I don't know walk in on me in the restroom or locker room, and I definitely wouldn't be comfortable with my kids (if I had any) be put into a similar situation. Why risk the chance of something happening just to appease the few?

My response was that of a woman, not a child. I do not have children. If I do, they will remove their undergarments in private, e.g. in a cubicle. I would fear paedophiles who identify as any gender perving on my children so I wouldn't let them show their underwear in public. The beach would concern me but what can you in a public place? One has to believe the normal folk outnumber the perverts.

The normal folks do outnumber the perverts, but that isn't going to prevent the perverts from attacking people like they already do. So I don't see how normal folk outnumbering perverts has anything to do with this. If even you would want to protect your kids, what is wrong by others wanting to do the same by not allowing any man to walk into the women's restroom or any woman walking into the men's restroom?

How do you protect your kids from same sex perverts? My point about outnumbering was that I would hope the presence of myself, and lots of other normal people, on a beach, in swimwear, would put off any pervert from attacking any children who they found overly arousing because they are wearing swimming costumes. Maybe there would be perverts getting their jollies staring at a pretty 13 year old girl in a bikini or a good looking lad of 12 in his Speedos, but no one can stop people looking and one has to hope, that in most sutuations, the normal people out number the perverts, therefore are more people at the beach to have fun than predate children.

You need to stop with your stupidity. The beach is completely different than the confinements of a public restroom.

I don't feel any point I have made is stupid. Personally, I think it is stupid to fear 'perverts' in public restrooms. Public spaces are likely as dangerous as the confines of a public rest room AND perverts pick on their own, and the opposite gender. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3434708/Iraqi-migrant-raped-10-year-old-boy-swimming-pool-Vienna-told-police-sexual-emergency-hadn-t-sex-months.html

The reason why I say your points are stupid is because the issue is with confined spaces like restrooms and locker rooms. Public areas attacks still happen, but majority happen when no one else is around.

Do research on the story that just happened weeks ago of the man who choked a girl until she passed out with her mom in the next stall. In an articke of the Washington Post they quoted someone excusing his actions (basically) saying that it probably happened because he identified as a woman and the girl was oppressing him, and then he chocked her. Majority of all attacks that happen in public areas happen when no one else is around. So what keeps a guy from walking into the women's restroom to wait for all but one to leave to attack her? It literally giving him confined spaces to do what he wants a lot easier. In public open areas, the victim as the ability to fight back easier, as well of having an easier chance to run away.

Kudos. A mature and reasonable womans perspective.