Imgflip Logo Icon

When You Realize That Science Fact Trumps Science Fiction

When You Realize That Science Fact Trumps Science Fiction | EVOLUTION? BUT DNA IS A CODON CONTAINING A MESSAGE REGARDING HOW TO PRODUCE AND/OR MAINTAIN A GIVEN LIVING SYSTEM; THERE'S GOT TO BE SOMETHING IN HERE THAT PROVES YOU CAN GET A MESSAGE WITHOUT A MESSENGER; THERE'S GOT TO BE SOMETHING IN BIOLOGY THAT PROVES YOU CAN GET A MESSAGE WITHOUT A MESSENGER; CHEMISTRY IS MY LAST HOPE TO PROVE THAT A MESSAGE CAN BE ACHIEVED WITHOUT A MESSENGER; GOOD SWEET GLUONS! EVOLUTION IS THE ABSOLUTE INVERSE OF THERMODYNAMICS AND IS THEREFORE IMPOSSIBLE! | image tagged in patrick star confused to scientist,science rules,evolution,interesting facts,the truth,professor | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
14 Comments
1 up, 7y,
1 reply
Roll Safe Think About It Meme | CAN'T BE OVER TURNED BY "SCIENTISTS" IF YOU ALREADY KNOW THE TRUTH. | image tagged in memes,roll safe think about it | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
You certainly know your stuff. :)
1 up, 7y,
1 reply
. | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
That's very kind of you. The truth is always the easiest story in the world to tell because it only comes in one version. Hence, when you look at things logically and scientifically, they can never argue against the God who made them. Also, here's a better version of that spongebob meme. I made this one to also deal with the common rebuttal that the sun's energy is what makes evolution possible.
1 up, 7y
Amen!
0 ups, 8y,
1 reply
It has been proven multiple times and thus is correct until proven otherwise.
0 ups, 8y,
1 reply
What & How?
0 ups, 8y,
1 reply
Well, first, let me ask you these questions:

Question One: Heredity exists, right? (this is a rhetorical question)
Question Two: Natural selection (survival of the fittest) occurs, right?
Question Three: Mutations happen, right?
Question Four: If natural selection occurs, would it not weed out the harmful mutations if mutations happen?
Question Five: If harmful mutations are weeded out, this would leave only harmless and even helpful mutations, right?
Question Six: If heredity exists, would it not allow these helpful mutations to be inherited?
Question Seven: If these helpful mutations are inherited, would it not be possible that they'd change the appearance of a species over time, perhaps even making a new species?

If you answered all of these questions "yes", that's evolution for you, and scientists HAVE observed it in nature.
0 ups, 8y,
1 reply
1] Heredity = Evolution like inheritance = riches. Nice try with the strawman though.
2] Natural selection, eh? Explain the sea Cucumber. How many ways did they get having their internal organs eanten wrong before they got it right?
3] Mutations happening are another strawman that does not = evolution. Go ahead and spell it out how it does.
4] A negative + a negative is a what? You haven't done the math on this.
5] If you've ever coded anything, you are likely to know that you can remove a problem without actually making your code work. You can't assume that lacking mutation is a benefit. Don't think so? Ever heard of RNAi therapy? It removes code with the insertion of good code. Mutated code would have no effect.
6] Varriation is one thing but, helpful mutation? Where are you getting this from? You are making a lot of assumptions here while proving nothing.
7] a spices is nothing more than a human classification. What counts are systems. It doesn't matter what variations you have in your systems. If it functions as said system, it is said system. Humans can't reproduce with horses because their systems are not the same. No amount of mutation will ever bridge that gap. No mutation will ever turn gills into lungs. The creature was coded with one or the other or both. This is a fact that is scientifically reproduceable all the way through the fossil record that each creature produces after its own kind. On top of all that, the assumption that code may be written without a coder, this meme deals with that, is on par with the claim that flies spontaneously generate from rotting meat.
0 ups, 8y,
1 reply
Accusing me of a strawman=either lack of understanding/troll/trying to strawman me/trying to distract me from the fact that you have been owned. Either way, I think I have just explained evolution to you, and if you don't think so, then you have a right to your opinion. Either way, as for the last part, about code without a coder, I DO believe that it is very likely that there is a god somewhere out there, though it needn't necessarily be the christian/islamic/jewish god or even a god that humanity has come up with at all.
0 ups, 8y,
1 reply
How can I possibly troll you on my own meme? You posted an opposing comment on a meme I own. Remember? You just built up another strawman. Your position is invalid and weak and you know no other defense because turning to the truth doesn't seem to be the thing you want to do. So, you build up a fake position for me in your mind that you think you are confident you can knock down. As far as explaining evolution goes, you have done nothing of the sort. You have asked questions and glanced at assertions related to the idea of evolution. Jesus the Christ is the only salvation of the only God there ever was, is, will be.
0 ups, 8y,
2 replies
Oh, so you want a strawman?! I'll give you a strawman! I think it's more likely that I came from an ape-like ancestor than a pile of dirt and a talking rib that came from said pile of dirt!
0 ups, 8y,
1 reply
You're an Alanis Morissette fan; aren't you? Scientists say we're star dust. Long before them, the Bible said we were made from dust. Changing systems and talking ribs? You need to get back on your meds. You're not as wello as you feel.
0 ups, 8y,
1 reply
You know, the funny thing about science is that it's right whether anyone believes it or not. I could be wrong. I could be right. We could both be wrong. So I will "take my meds" (if you want to put it that way, I prefer the term "Getting a drink of coffee") , and then we could have this pleasant discussion after we're both less pissed off at each other.
0 ups, 8y
The funny thing about science is that it needs to be predictably reproduceable. Evolution most certainly is not. Also, you've got another strawman working there. Your emotions are not my emotions. I'm not the one who has to piece together falsehoods and try to make them work. So, I can sit back and answer with ease.
0 ups, 8y
Oh, and I'm wondering, will you ever dare touch on the thermodynamics of evolution? That was kind of a major part of this meme.
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
EVOLUTION? BUT DNA IS A CODON CONTAINING A MESSAGE REGARDING HOW TO PRODUCE AND/OR MAINTAIN A GIVEN LIVING SYSTEM; THERE'S GOT TO BE SOMETHING IN HERE THAT PROVES YOU CAN GET A MESSAGE WITHOUT A MESSENGER; THERE'S GOT TO BE SOMETHING IN BIOLOGY THAT PROVES YOU CAN GET A MESSAGE WITHOUT A MESSENGER; CHEMISTRY IS MY LAST HOPE TO PROVE THAT A MESSAGE CAN BE ACHIEVED WITHOUT A MESSENGER; GOOD SWEET GLUONS! EVOLUTION IS THE ABSOLUTE INVERSE OF THERMODYNAMICS AND IS THEREFORE IMPOSSIBLE!