Matrix Morpheus

Shes a criminal. Do your research.

I'm voting blue no matter who ;-)

There are 2 choices on the Democrat side.I would prefer 1 over the other,but only one will get the nomination.They might be the person I prefer maybe not.
Either way way,why would that be a problem for American democracy?
Since when did a voter become forced to vote for their first choice and if they aren't nominated then the voter shouldn't be allowed to vote for any other?
the republican candidates signed a contract promising to support their nominee no matter who it is.Even if they know that candidate may be the worst person possible for president.
If your favorite candidate doesn't receive the nomination does that mean you won't vote at all?

Still a better choice than Trump or Cruz

Bernie is the only option I will not vote for Hillary

If Bernie doesn't get the nomination(it's my hope he does) that leaves her... a non-vote is the same as voting for the GOP
If Bernie doesn't win the primary,there could still be the possibility of Clinton being indicted and losing the support of super delegates,they would go to Sanders.

Do not under estimate the overwhelming amount of people who are not knee deep into politics like we are and will vote only by their performances in the few debates they watch, and by the few corporate media headlines influencing their decisions. Polls have indicated that a general election between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton has Donald Trump almost tied with her. Meanwhile polls in a general election between Bernie and Donald Trump Bernie beats him by a mile. What im saying is a vote for Hillary might aswell be a vote for Trump, because with Hillary as the primary, Trump has a good chance of actually beating her.

I have already caucused for Bernie,Colorado supports Bernie

I agree,but IF that's the matchup then she will need all the votes she can get to win.
;-) let's hope for the best

You can't be 'for' the anti-establishment, anti-capitalist candidate and support the former first lady, ex-party line senator, secretary of state who was pro-nafta, pro-big banks, earns in the top 1%, gets paid $200k per speaking engagement, etc. without being a hypocritical bastard.

Any candidate may not be exactly what a voter wants,it's impossible to agree with every policy or plan they present.However if each candidate has appealing ideals to the voter then casting a ballot isn't hypocrisy because that voter hasn't denounced either candidate,and agree with both.
Signing a contract to support a candidate that at some point they've already denounced and publicly stated the person was not worthy of the office,and then publicly stating that they are suddenly the most qualified is an undeniable hypocrite and liar.