Image Title

There's a pretty distinct difference between mature and vulgar, especially in the realm of comedy. This is why I believe that King of the Hill, for example, is much more mature than something like Hazbin Hotel. It might not make sense to you right now, but just trust me, it will.

So your saying the TV-14 show about a family in suburban Texas is more mature than a TV-MA show about people in actual hell?

Yes. Again, I know it sounds contradictory, but you will understand in time.

Sure buddy

Hazbin Hotel is more mature than King of the Hill tbh

Exactly

I can't understand it for you, I can only explain it to you. Even then, I don't know if I have the time, patience, or crayons to do that. You see, "mature" "humor," which is two lies in one in Hazbin's case, relies on shock value, socially frowned-upon subjects, and crudity. Generally speaking, it's hilarious on first watch, and nothing but comatose crickets on the second. Actual mature humor, like King of the Hill, relies on wit, relatability, and subtlety, with just enough absurdity to make it funny, but just little enough for it to still believable. Bojack Horseman also accomplished this decently well, assuming you're willing to ignore the fact that most of the characters are furries.