where did people get that first sentence from

them after they didnt get validation:

Goodbye and good riddance

Nah jk lol it's still sad

especially when its forced on them the second they gain mobility

Also with the Charlie Kirk incident this trans MFS killed him for having an opinion!

Exacly!!

What I really want from this assassination is I want to call to arms I want everyone to realize that we no longer can negotiate with leftist what I want after this is a civil war and rebellion because this day and age is proving that freedom of speech and our first amendment rights are being violated and we can no longer express ourselves without being censored or people trying to cancel culture us or any of that

Yeah dude, I completely agree. The LGBTQ, black lives matter, and leftists are ruining the country completely and they expect us to be quiet about it

How bout we spread awareness... One spark of rebellion can always start with a voice let's start # remember Kirk ! And # let's bring our guns and start civil war against leftist!

Hell yeah !

Let's do it on IMGFLIP!

How can a civil war solve an issue of disagreement? The first amendment allows for people to have disagreements. Hatred and resentment in America is the thing you should be having a bloody fight AGAINST because we NEED one another, we need different opinions, thoughts, ideas, left and right. Do you think America was formed by a civil war where we committed a genocide against anti-federalists or federalists? The constitution appealed to both sides with the Bill of Rights and a strong nation that has allowed us to voice our opinions and speak out against the injustices of our brothers and sisters for more than 200 years, yet you think the only way to get your point across is to resort to violence?

Frankly, you are no better than Kirk's assassin if one truly thinks that. Hatred has gone so far, it makes us contemplate whether or not we should kill each other. That's disgusting and sad, and one of the most anti-American things people could agree on. I know you are driven by your political party as left-leaning Americans are as well, but the angered people are plunging their knives of hatred into this country whether they are realizing it or not.

I might not agree with what you say, but I will ensure you have the right to say things in general (unless there are violent things said because cmon bro, you're better than this).

Also I have a really good counter argument for your first amendment argument All right well Charlie Kirk was doing was expressing his feelings and an assassin shot him in the neck for what he was stating and what he believed it are we just going to allow that to happen are we going to allow these leftist people kill us for having our own opinions or are we going to start a civil war to fight back and to protect ourselves and our beliefs?

And by "these leftist people," are you referring to those few who have taken extreme measures by murdering someone who openly supported debates from different perspectives? I totally understand your fear, the first amendment is one of the most important amendments our country has bestowed upon us, and it is a good question to ask if there are going to be more people that will commit more political violence. Political violence comes from people who are entrenched in hatred, preventing them from getting their points across in a civil manner. People like Charlie Kirk promoted open debates, but many topics that he had supported had caused historically ostracized groups to become enraged. These contentions had built up until his death, and when people celebrated (which isn't justifiable in any sense) it only drives more hatred from his supporters, and this assumption is created that all right-leaning people are racist and all left-leaning people support political violence. The polarization of political parties was driven by this hate, and it will make it harder for us to unite.

We have differences, but we have inalienable rights and we need to use them responsibly and speak to more reasonable people with an audience that differs from my/your views. Subtracting hate will bring us to more common ground, not by calling an entire political party and all those who affiliate with it non-American or politically incorrect. There are no right answers in politics, there are only better solutions that are made from different perspectives.

You are skewing my point when going back to our country's history. I am very well aware that we went to war for our independence, but because we were being taxed without representation and being controlled by a foreign government. My point was when we were forming with anti-federalists and federalists, one side believing that the country should focus more on liberty while the other focused more on order. Because we implemented those ideas, we've gotten a Bill of Rights to protect our liberties and a stronger government (compared to the Articles of Confederation) that was made to put things like Shays' Rebellion to an end (If you don't know what that was, it was basically revolutionary farmers being upset that their land was being taken away because they couldn't pay their debts but they would've been paid for their efforts in the revolutionary war if the government under the Articles of Confederation had power to levy taxes. As important as it was an issue, it highlights the weaknesses of a divided country).

The problem is how political violence contributes to hatred in America because it divides us when we ought to be a united nation. You prove nothing substantial if your claims justify more murders of political differences. To bring up something I've said before in a different chat that is quite applicable:

"When a side claims the other side is tearing the flesh of liberty from the body of this nation, they will grab it towards them until both sides are in a similar struggle, not realizing they both are slowly killing the very thing they are fighting for, only intended for their own benefit."

If sides are going to keep pulling and justifying their actions, they will reach a moment of tension until the nation tears apart into anarchy. If we had called for a Civil War, that brings us much closer to a slaughtered country.

Yeah but But if The civil war is going to do that or country was doomed from the start but still it doesn't justify the fact that our freedom of speech is being endangered not by the government but by our own people in this dystopia society by killing Charlie Kirk You see Charlie Kirk yes you're right he did handle debates He did like spreading wisdom by having people express their other views but you see the ironic part of that is that when he was discussing his views he was silence and killed for them and it was mostly a person from the group of people who are woke were leftist that shot him and people praise him for him which are also leftists which proves to us Republic Americans who believe power should go to us not The government is showing us that again our freedom of speech is being invalidated and we are being killed for what we expressed by our own people So in order to protect ourselves and in order to fight for our beliefs our rights and freedoms unfortunately sir we're going to have to kill each other I know it's not right I know I too hate war and would being discussed to join it but you see there was once a movie that expresses why America is falling It's not Charlie Kurt but it's someone else That wise man once said in the film " The first sign an empire is failing is when its people question the institutions the empire was built on the structure of government, the churches, the schools, they reject God because the emperors keep believing they are God and the people become so rich & everyone believes they are an emperor as well & too good to do the job that built the empire in the first place. So they outsource those jobs & they open their borders to allow desperate people to do all the other jobs the other people are too rich to do and then comes the guilt for all this wealth but still the empire thrives but now everyone questions their wealth and they question themselves and then they reject everything that built the Empire to begin with they destroy their own symbols and attack themselves like a cancer. Attack the people who protect the empire, attack you for protecting it. And then the wolves come and all the people who lived like emperors will know the suffering they blame themselves for creating and they will be slaughtered and the new empire will rise from its ashes. Then the cycle Begins again! " So yes if we are going to go into complete anarchy and destroy our nation is because America was doomed from the start with the cycle and

Break these chains

First of all we literally went to war due to different ideologies so we can win our independence 2. The problem isn't about Kurt's assassin that killed him It's about that we no longer can negotiate with people and have different opinions that we get killed so we must show we won't handle that type of violence and protect ourselves of our opinions Or we will all be killed and Since we no longer can negotiate we are going to wage war And third we tried peace with the leftist and we got someone killed for it sometimes in order to manage peace we need to wage war

To trade our republic for senseless vengeance would be a great disgrace to all those who had fought and died for a free nation. Nobody wins in war, the only things that come out of it are death and anger, and to use warfare as a means of getting points across will leave a hideous and irremovable scar on everyone to the point that the United States would become a dream forgotten long ago.

Not to poke fun at how you're saying things, but the way you're formatting your claims aren't clear---You're arguing with hard-driven emotions and not constructive claims, and you're only proving the cycle is true and how people resort to violence when they cannot get their points across.

I don't mean this to be seen as a form of mockery, but your claims are clearly driven by animosity and a futile vengeance because you aren't aware of what the toll of a Civil War in America would be. If you truly wanted to protect opinions, you wouldn't resort to a costly war that would have been fought in vain.

You have always had the right to say what you want and there are people that have taken things seriously and resorted to violence, but that's been the case of history. You think we would have started a Civil War because Martin Luther King Jr. and Medgar Evers were shot and killed because they were voices for their opinions? No, it would have only ended in more serious consequences if we had done so. Instead, the Civil Rights movement continued to peacefully protest as it was their right to do so and segregation had ended, civilly acquiring equality with the Constitution by their side.

I'm not saying people don't have the right to be frustrated, but a Civil War would destroy everything we already have. The people who were involved with the Civil Rights movement got their points across peacefully and did so much more than violence could have ever done. I want this republic to be secured by one another and Civil War would show that we didn't deserve the rights bestowed upon us.

Tell me how many people have killed for having different opinions that were on the left side how many times has our government ignored it We need a civil war to take back control for the people take power away from the government as well as the people that is brainwashed from it

this is so real tho

See if the government wasn’t f**ked up they wouldn’t do this stuff to stay valid in history

See, people who are trans have a mental disorder, it's called Gender Dysphoria, look it up.

Finally one agrees with me

Ain’t our government run by a CONVICTED felon?

They just didn't want him president, so they locked him up.

Its cause he commit crimes my guy, the law goes for everyone, even sentient oranges with fake hair

You forgot to mention themselves
school, church or themselves

Kaboom, yes rico