Someone needs a tissue

“Endowed by our creator” with inalienable rights. Christians loving their country is no worse than any other group who loves their country. You ascribe your paranoia to words that you make up definitions for. No ones forcing anyone to be a Christian. As a matter of fact Christian and Jews had reformations and haven’t forcibly converted anyone for quite a while. Islam hasn’t stopped. The kids praying in church scared you? They were definitely Christian and very likely loved their country. They are your enemy?

Putting the Ten Commandments in classrooms does not establish a religion. It simply notes the foundational values of Western Covilization including the United States. These are universal values and there is nothing wrong with posting something with morals in our rotten school system.

If classrooms were noting the foundational values of "Western Covilization," they'd be encouraging patriotism, liberty, and the freedoms we fought for against British oppression and slavery, not a religion.

Christianity from a secular perspective isn't THE religion with universal values, not everyone in this world is a christian :O

Besides, not once have you given me a source for any of your "claims" in the conversations we've exchanged with one another, so with a sense of reasonability, I find your statements devoid of substance because they lack the substantial ground you claim to say you have

Dear god, for someone claiming to defend the nation's purity, you'd think you'd put an ounce of care into what you say lol.

Defending the nations purity? 😂 No nation, or kingdom or man is pure. All flawed, but some seek perfection and some don’t. Seems hypocritical for you to demand sources when you haven’t posted any for your opinions either. Not that I want them. Exchanging sources for opinion is an exercise in futility. Facts however are facts and are verifiable.

Who said Christianity was “the” religion of universal values? Name a religion that conflicts with the Ten Commandments and says one of the ten are good things not bad things. Cite your Source” as well please.

Ah yes because all of what you said somehow justifies you not providing sources. I never specified if it were people, but I'd assume, given your strong opinions that the "purity" I stated would resonate with your views of Christian Nationalism---not the people who are in it, the movement itself, despite it having roots to the justification of slavery and segregation, Social Darwinism, etc.

And SURELY I never said "Louisiana with the 10 commandments bill and it was deemed unconstitutional (thank god).

https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/federal-appeals-court-rules-against-louisiana-law-requiring-public-schools-to-display-ten-commandments-in-every-classroom

https://www.laaclu.org/news/louisiana-becomes-first-state-require-ten-commandments-public-school-classrooms/" because I, a hypocritical libtard, would never provide just A SINGLE SOURCE...

...because I provided two

I will say though, you're agreeing with me on something that I said christianity "is not the religion with universal values," you're somehow skeptical on facts haha.

Here's a lil something tho

Buddhism, a non-theistic religion has principles such as removing suffering (dukkha) because it comes from craving, attachment, and ignorance. Buddhism does believe that murder goes against their way of living, yet they do not owe it to the Old Testament as Buddhism had already existed by the time Abrahamic religions reached India (Buddhism was created roughly around the 6th century BC while Christianity reached India in 52 AD of St. Thomas) But even without religion in mind, you'd still face legal, social, and personal repercussions. You don't always think in terms of religion, you reflect of the actions that affect your life. Morality is shaped by consequence and empathy, not through divine command.

Our fear builds morality, our fear builds behavior, our fear builds societies.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4241340/#:~:text=Overview,kin%20and%20in%2Dgroup%20members.
https://spice.fsi.stanford.edu/docs/introduction_to_buddhism
https://www.pbs.org/edens/thailand/buddhism.htm
https://www.uri.org/kids/world-religions/buddhist-beliefs
https://thebuddhistcentre.com/buddhism
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Buddhism

So where and what are YOUR sources? Just Donald Trump? Because he does all the thinking for you?

You should just use your account rather than this alt account because your arguments and talking points identify you. You provided source for the Louisiana law proposed. So what, I didn’t deny it. The rest of your opinions are unsupported and I really don’t care how you formed them. Facts are power. You can’t identify the difference apparently.

So I’m still waiting for you to find the religion that conflicted with the “universal values” expressed in the Ten Commandments? Then you go on a screed about Buddhism and post sources supporting it while missing the entire point. I didn’t ever claim that the universal values were invented by the Abraham’s religions or who came first. So I’m still waiting for you to point out where it conflicted with the universal values of the Ten Commandments. You can’t do you try to post more deflection.

You're the one to talk about unsupported opinions because you haven't provided me a least a single source ever and when confronted about it, you go silent. You don't make facts, you're not a professional and neither am I, yet I have some ounce of dignity to dig for research while you sit back, relax, and keep on cherry picking until you get a question to ask that has no substance. I genuinely do believe we can create constructive conversations, yet you have been the one asking too-specific questions in a way that skews the real answer towards your liking.

If you're still complaining that the answer you receive isn't the answer that you want, then you're gonna have to keep on waiting because there's no meaning in feeding you information that you're just going to spit out. So please, I would consider answering future questions if you would be willing to provide sources to some of the statements you make. Because quite frankly, how can one call another out for an unsupported statement when they themself cannot support their own arguments?
Please (if you are able) take this into consideration and do take care! :)

I said nothing about unsupported opinions. I don’t want to know the source of your opinion. I don’t care where you formed your opinions. Though it’s obvious where most of your claims come from.

Hmm I wonder why my name is called John Locke Fella... hmmm...... interesting observation!