no, no,
you're just confused.
a pedophile is a freak who is sexually attracted to children.
if someone draws pornographic content of children, they are by definition a pedophile.
no one who isn't a pedo would draw sexualized children.
(fyi being a pedo is objectively bad)
also..
"...drawing a young looking anime girl isn't based on a real child. Therefore, your logic doesn't work if you think about it for more than one second. "
???
none of that quote uses actual logic or makes any point.
who in their right mind gives a f**k if it's not a "REAL" child??
that's like saying looking at/creating drawn pcrn of adult women is gay bc they aren't "real" women.
the point is that it's a depiction of a woman;
drawn child p.rn is a depiction of a child;
it still counts.