Anyone done this?

my current favorite is; "There are uncountable ways the laws of the universe could have been written that would prevent our creation."

Only effective response is the multiverse theory or a higher power, and the former has less proper evidence then the latter.

Please explain.

Basically, the laws of the universe- energy, matter, etc, all contribute to our sustained existence, and if they were even a little different we may never have been here in the first place.

The chances are unbelievable that we don't exist, and yet we do- necessitating either many different universes where we happen to be in one that allows for life, or that something- a higher power, had crafted the universe so that it allowed for life.

Respond to the Multiverse adherent something like: 'So, whats more scientifically probable to create intelligent life...an infinite amount of unintelligent universes OR an infinitely intelligent God?

See, the Multiverse is a pseudo-scientific copout, since each one of those individual universes are faced with the exact same astronomical and impossible odds against producing life—regardless of how many there are.

Atheists would then have to say 'Well, of course it could happen, cuz we are here, right?'

That the precisely same argument they condemn Christians for when we say 'Of course God created us, because we are here, right?'

And these atheists claim to be 'scientific'? No, all they are is religious anti-Christians..

Has anyone ever observed, or measured an alternate, unintelligent universe, or anything unintelligent producing life at all?
Then its not science, its wishful thinking.