#GlobetardsBeLike: just add water!

That is a nice gif of the earth's geoid (gravity map). Just curious?, do you believe the Apollo missions are a hoax?

Gravity is a misnomer for a modality of electromagnetism, and is really just a downward vector of force, motion, inertia and acceleration.
Moon Landing Debunked:
http://www.nasamoonhoax.com
http://investigate-nasa.com
http://www.apollohoax.net/forum/index.php?topic=945.1315;wap2
http://www.wakingtimes.com/2015/03/20/if-the-moon-landings-were-real-then-why-is-nasa-stumped-by-this/
http://moonfaker.com/faqs.html
http://www.angelfire.com/moon2/xpascal/MoonHoax/ApolloReflectors/ApolloReflectors.HTM
http://moralmatters.org/2016/10/03/nasa-nemesis-the-firmament/

Cool, thanks for the links. As an engineer I'm always looking for the things that don't add up, the data outliers, how the observable universe appears to us, things that others might miss, what it all means. Throughout history the great leaps in science have been made by heretics, people who were unshakable in their (unpopular at best) beliefs and were ultimately proven right. I'm open to all scientific viewpoints, however in sharing my viewpoint I personally would never be addressing an audience using a "tard" suffix. http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/0/22078983

Thanks Andrew! I welcome your open-mindedness, and with regards to the "tard" suffix, it just means the globeheads are "late" to the game. Besides, it's Nothing Sirius! ????

So where does that downward force come from? I mean what makes it go down (and not up, sideways etc.)

We have an answer for that - things move downwards because of gravity. What's your reason? What force is acting on everything uniformly to make it move "down". For that matter, what is down?

What makes things go up, down or anywhere if there isn't any gravity. I have seen some FE theory stating that the earth is accelerating upwards but 0 evidence of any kind, just wild guesses about dark matter propelling it. I mean come on.

I am also troubled with what constitutes "evidence". Many people offer links to videos, photos and the word of people who work in these industries. These are refuted utterly by Flat Earthers. Yet in the links above you have ONE interview with an ex NASA employee and that's suddenly acceptable evidence?

It's either evidence or it's not, and if you are truly going on empiricism then I want you to tell me how you are 100% sure that the earth is flat, given that you have never seen it yourself.

You keep using words like "evidence" and then provide absolutely none of it.

Also your Latin lessons are fun but... tell me how someone would circumnavigate a sphere and not move in a circle? If you start at one point on a football, then draw your finger in a straight line round it, you've just drawn a f**king circle.

You wanna talk about this then I'm free 24/7. But you have to come back with something better than "EX NASA EMPLOYEE BUSTS IT WIDE OPEN" while ignoring every other interview, scientific paper and... actually why am I even talking to you? You won't accept anything we say as evidence anyway. F**kwit.

As for my evidence, as NASA does do actual scientific research, one must be discerning in what information is shared with the public. If what is being shared becomes common knowledge, than you must accept it for what it is. The fact is that we live on a flat stationary planate. As evidenced by commercial, military and amateur pilots: https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88104main_H-1391.pdf

Aircraft dynamics simply would not work on the heliocentric model. The Federal Aviation Authority wouldn’t spend so much time putting together a document for ALL pilots to reference as models if the earth was not flat and stationary: https://t.co/RQ0JWYYqRm?ssr=true
FAA
https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ang/offices/tc/about/campus/faa_host/labs/tgf/media/AircraftDynamicsModel.pdf

And if you know a thing or two about EM transmissions and geodesy, the United States Army’s Research Laboratory has done a fantastic job at distributing a wonderful explanation of how electromagnetic transmissions work on our #FlatEarth: http://www.arl.army.mil/arlreports/2001/ARL-TR-2352.pdf

If your brain hurts after that last one, try wrapping your globeheaded brain around this #FlatEarth .mil report on how radio dipoles work on our Flat stationary plane. http://www.dtic.mil/get-tr-doc/pdf?AD=ADA250489
Thank me later fool

Gravity can be debunked by understanding it’s 4 basic electromagnetic modalities: force, inertia, motion, and acceleration. And of gravity pulls everything down then how can smokestacks release tons of billowing plumes of smoke effortlessly into the sky? Why isn’t the smoke falling to the ground? How do clouds form if gravity is pulling the water vapor to the earth and into the oceans? How can you have clouds, rainshowers and ocean captured in a single photo if gravity is acting on all three at once?
Evidence IMHO must be scrutinized and subjected to scientific method PRIOR to be accepted. And to this day I have not seen any scientific method to support or prove empirically that a spinning ball in a vacuum with a thin layer of water occupying 70% of its outer surface can exist without a physical atmospheric barrier. And based on the universal gravitational constant, this should be a easily tested proven and validated phenomena...Which we all know it is not. The reason why it is not is said to be because of Earth’s large mass, Completely contradicting the laws of universal gravitational constant! You can’t prove gravity because you don’t have enough...yet proving it exists using even the smallest amount cannot be demonstrated either. That is the essence of scientism. And FE article that you read stating that the earth is accelerating upward is the flat Earth Society. A disinformation entity, co-opting the Flat Earth as cointelpro, spreading halfwit ideas that are not shared by most all modern Flat Earthers. Do your own research!