Firstly, I would like to point out that I am agruing the point of a lack of a creator being plausible. I do think that is is possible, however unlikely, that a creator exists. Also, people do not turn away from God because they do not want an authority above them to exist. There are other reasons, correct me if I am wrong, but you most likely heard that reason from a religious leader that does not undetstand how an aithest thinks. Please do not try to claim religious leaders know how aithiests think, as they mostly do not.
On the subject of abiogenisis, the Miller-Urey experiment did not prove abiogenisis, but provided solid evidence that it is plausible that life could come from non-life. Next, I would like to point out, while steady-state theory has been debunked, there are other models that support an eternal universe, like a cosmic bounce or cyclic model. To adress your claim about Boyle's law, in the scenario of Boyle's law, heat can not radiate from the system, where as in a star formation, some heat can radiate out, reducing pressure and allowing the gas to form a star. Lastly, I would like to emphasize that our epistemologies are very different. You build your's around faith, while aithiests build their's around science and hard facts. Ultimately, we will not be able to convince eachother that we are right because of our epistemologies. Thank you.