1. There is no victim. It is a made up crime.
2. Contribution is voluntary. Ask how stealing from people makes them victims. That is self-answering.
3. I like to pay for services I use and I don't want to pay for those I don't. Nor should I have to. I pay for private schools for my kids, but could always homeschool for free. The police spends more time hassling me and no time at all helping me when I need it. That's when they say "We're too busy and you're not dead" (actual quote from a police sergeant). My house is designed from scratch to be fireproof.
Why can't it be a la carte? Why shouldn't it be? What if Costco just "subscribed you" and forced you to spend $10,000/year there and it decided what you took home, not you? You'd be pretty pissed about that, unless you grew up with it being that way and you just assumed that this is the only way it could be because that's how you were taught at Costco school.
Why can't I pick and choose what parts of society to help, especially those I can see, not supposed victims that just walk in with a "bad back" or "I can't find a job" and then I'm forced into helping them? I know people who have defrauded or didn't need the system but took the money because they could. Even if you're injured, you can still work. There are plenty of jobs, just mainly lazy and picky people. Why would someone take a $10/hour job if they can get $15/hour doing nothing? I know a Bernie supporter who won't marry their boyfriend (and father of her kids) and I suspect, but can't prove, that they are getting more money from the government by not being married, because that's how it works. Free money for the kids and low income, and while they live together, a fake address for the father means more money for the mother.
See, you're proving my point. 35% of the people are getting money for nothing and making limited or no contribution when they could easily help society. So your policies are literally sociopathic.