I clearly didn't refer to suppression, but disagreement. Individuals are, or at least should be, allowed to disagreement. Suppression refers to active removal of what is actually true. This is merely an opposing view from another individual. From their point of view, even if your faith is objectively true, they don't see that, and you're also both people. Leviticus was specifically the law for the Israelites, God's chosen people.
Active enforcement of such an "objective truth" requires an authoritarian state apparatus. Any religious society should not be compulsory; God, if He exists, knows that not every human is inherently going to believe in Him. People commit sin. In fact, it'll encourage more people to pretend to be Christian for performativeness and survival whilst not truly being so, which I'd argue harms the faith more than it helps it. And we know they won't be saved in heaven anyway.
But this assumes your claim of there being "no exception" refers to legal enforcement. If you're not, you're literally just pointlessly leaving comments that are going to get deleted anyway, like a retarded 12 year old.