My response:
In my apologies, I couldn't find any specific screenshots / comments about the specifics. I will be taking down the comments against drizzle, but before that, quick thing.
I wasn't the only one saying that type of shit against drizzle. It might seem understandable that someone might be trying to intentionally spread misinformation about someone if they're the only one doing it, but in this case basically everyone was on Nat's side.
Drizzle, even outside of the thing with Nat, was already a user that was disliked because was on the fence between posting genuine porn and posting unfunny sexually tinted memes. If someone wanted to choose a side, they'd choose Nat because Nat is generally more likable. Where am I going with this you might think? People are bound to overexatterate stuff if it's against someone they already dislike, Drizzle commented something against Nat that could be considered harassment using her face, without permission. And although I don't have proof of it happening, people were all AT THE SAME TIME responding to it with negative comments about Drizzle, if all the hate came at the exact same time by basically everyone, then there's no way that that could've been simple misinformation that spread via telling others.
This situation was on the brink of dying out. It was something so small that could've ended with a short ban for Drizzle, and possibly Nat, but by banning Nat and me instead you dragged the situation towards even more attention, making this situation worse for not only Nat's side but also Drizzle.
Thank you for reading.