Okay but what if there isn't? Im not saying "in this universe this happens and you jump to a universe where it's different". I mean THIS universe is edited such that THIS data doesn't exist
Id schrodinger said that at a funeral he was preparing for himself that he could be dead ans have the funeral be real or alive and the funeral was secretly fake
Would opening his casket amd seeing him ACTUALLY dead count as murder?
Nah, quantum physics don't exactly work that way. Schrödinger's cat is more of a simplification of how collapsing states are. In reality, the cat's state of dead or alive woul
...would probably be "measured" by the environment. So would schrodinger himself. Large objects like cats and people aren't beholden to quantum physics, because thats not at the quantum level
What if nobody does? You forget, everyone else forgets, because they didn't exist. But it's still something you did and you're personally responsible for somebody not existing
it's more about whether it would be reprehensible if people were to know. Or if it's more or less reprehensible than straight up killing a dude. I mean yeah, it's a dumb hypothetical meant to explore a random question
lmao yeh
but its an interesting paradoxal type question
but morals slowly get lost on science when the science changes the basis of what our morals are with or against.
so uhhh yeh
If you retroactively made it so that a person never existed in the first place, is that as morally reprehensible as murder? Or is one worse than the other? Killing them while they've lived at least means that they got to experience SOME life. At the same time, if they genuinely never existed after you make it so, there's nobody to have been robbed. Death leaves a corpse and memories, but thorough nonexistence is just that.
Caption this Meme 