CHILD PROTECTION
AND CUSTODIAL SAFETY
ARE NOT REAL; If only bruises are considered; THE ABUSER
INEVITABLY BLAMES
THE VICTIM; THEIR
GENETICS OR LUCK. COVERT ABUSE
LEAVES SCARS
YOU CAN'T SEE--; Until the victim's
scars are inflicted
later, self-harming
and seeking abuse
as intimacy, and
the mental denial of
breaking themselves
to see machiavellian
darkness as as a
life-giving
virtue and source
of balance, to make
sense of their
suffering and
involuntary sacrifice. Not all abuse
bruises, but all
abuse scars. IT MAY BE HEREDITARY,
BUT IT WASN'T PASSED
TO THEM GENETICALLY. When they aren't,
they may resent
people calling
themselves victims
who didn't endure
bruises. Those who were
bruised are especially
blind to these scars,
and the behavior
that causes them. Bruises or not,
they are often scarred
again as adults,
unwilling to leave
harmful situations
because they can
convince themselves
there is no harm,
since there are no
marks to make it
seem real, nothing
finite to describe.
Or, sometimes,
even if there are.
Sometimes,
to them,
the marks might be
proof of love...
Or make love feel real. They minimise cries
for help and don't
understand harmful
actions they see.
Their failure to identify
harm leads them to
enable and protect
abusers. Their charges, who
depend on them, may
never be acquainted
with real protection,
advocacy, security,
or know self-worth,
privacy or dignity.