Like the odds of us evolving like we did are astronomically low, so there’s some force assisting us

I don’t see the point arguing

Eh, I’m fine with religious debate as long as it’s not unnecessarily heated (like usual here).

I’m more of a science dude tbh, but I have read the bible and it’s pretty goid

10/10 would read again

Adam and Eve
First people on earth not to read apples terms and conditions

Trendsetters

I'm open to the concept of God but yeah that story is really confusing and goes against a lot of things that have been proven

Ikr. Most other things have been proven though like Noah’s ark

Noah's ark was proven true? I don't believe in it, but the story is very cool and I respect it

There’s evidence of large scale flooding. It was probably exaggerated to some extent. Like no boat could fit 2 of every animal. And no floods are worldwide. So likely it was more along the lines of a city wide flooding with local wildlife

That's a little confusing though because like if a flood happened here, I know darn well nobody's making a boat for the kangaroos. Unless they really love kangaroos though I guess. Idk. Maybe it could happen

Or, they were instructed by god

i think a god is plausible, but i don’t think any religion’s explanation of it is correct :3

I want to meet Jesus and work on writing a flawless, more easily deciphered version of the bible

that’s if jesus is the son of god and the bible is actually true

There are many accurate historical records proving his existence and the fact that he was raised from the dead

sure he existed but him being raised from the dead is unlikely

That was documented as well

documents can be false especially when they’re from 2000 years ago

Not when there’s dozens reporting the same thing

you have shown no evidence

So that’s the concern
Gotchu

https://peacefulscience.org/articles/daniel-ang-a-scientist-looks-at-the-resurrection/

https://www.magiscenter.com/blog/5-historical-ways-of-verifying-jesus-resurrection?hs_amp=true

https://www.desiringgod.org/articles/historical-evidence-for-the-resurrection

https://stpaulcenter.com/posts/the-powerful-historical-evidence-for-the-resurrection-of-jesus

biased

Yk what, you can do research on this yourself on whatever you consider unbiased. Many atheists have and discovered my claims true

your evidence is literally the bible, give me an unbiased source XD

I just linked it to you 😭

yea and half the links are have the names like “welovegod.com” while the other half use the bible as their source of evidence which is a biased source

and also simply a bad source

Again, you’re gonna want to research this on your own. Find what you deem an unbiased source, those seldom exist. hell even chatGPT has bias

every source is biased, but using a christian organization and the bible without even comparing it to the other side is blatantly biased and lazy

Imo im agnostic meaning i disagree yet agree with everything because idk what could be correct however i do somewhat believe the stoned ape theory