The reason why Trump wants to designate a non existent organization 'domestic terrorist'

The only people who have to worry are those all dressed in black, wearing helmets and face coverings, wielding bats, umbrellas, bricks and stones while blocking traffic and attacking people that they disagree with.

SAN DIEGO (CN) — Multiple left-wing protesters received sentences of up to two years in jail on Friday in a novel case that pinned them as members of "antifa" that tried to stifle the speech of right-wingers in the San Diego neighborhood of Pacific Beach in 2021.

San Diego Superior Court Judge Daniel Goldstein said that the trial proved to him that antifa exists as an organization that appears to “have funding and they have an ability to make contact and morph into other things very quickly in many different jurisdictions.”

The defendants, he added, committed assault on supporters of former president Donald Trump and right-wing groups to stifle their First Amendment rights “for the benefit of antifa.”

Antifa does not exist as a unified organization, examples of actual bonafide Right wing hate organizations, are,

The Proud boys, 3 percenter's, Boogaloo boys, KKK, Aryan nation, Oath keepers, Kentucky state militia, Ohio State militia, Arizona state militia, The army of God.
But that's not going to stop Taco from declaring ghosts as a terrorist organization.

Trump is putting in place a way to arrest future protesters, Political figures, and individuals by creating scary, leftist, boogie men, using a blanket term "Antifa".

This way, he can label everyone a 'Terrorist', and jail them without trials.
Trump truly intendeds to lock up millions of people in this country with Steven Miller as his architect of evil. All for the high crime of pissing off Trump.

It may not be a centralized organization, but it's an organization with shared ideals of violence nonetheless. They don't need to be unified or centralized under one form, they just need to commit acts of terrorism. Considering terrorism defined as "the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims", ANTIFA definitely qualifies. As does the Kirk Killer. Hell, technically speaking, the people who carved swastikas into Teslas would also qualify due to the fact they intimidated people for political means.

Also, while I'm not too familiar with most of the organizations you named, the KKK was created and endorsed by the Democrats. And it was the Dems who supported both slavery and segregation before both were made illegal thanks to the Republicans.

So, it seems we both agree , when you say carving a swastika into a Tesla is an act of terrorism?
Then anyone who attempts to overthrow the government, for reasons of changing the results of a free and fair election? With the leader watching it from TV ? Would be, by your definition, Terrorism.

But that terrorist, who by the way, pardoned the terrorists. Is magically calling the shots. And you are defending, and supporting, the policies of a terrorist.

You do know that Trump actively called for the protestors NOT to turn it into a riot, right? And that they were guided in by the cops? And that most of them were peaceful (unlike BLM)? And that the only people who got killed were protestors? And no, I'm not counting the Alt F4-ing cops, they could've had different mental problems that led to them ending themselves.

You do know your deflecting. I get it, when Trump is characterized as a terrorist by your own definition? Where do you stand?

Face it, Trump is at the very least employing authoritarian tactics to eliminate the opposition and political rivals.

Why? Because Trump can't accept that the first amendment protects free speech for every American. Not just maga.

Fox news narratives may work with maga.
But they fall flat when discussion concerns real world, DJT, consequences.