Can we stop arguing about the justification of the unban already? I already can explain this shit and I make a good point already. THREE OWNERS said YES. It makes it already the majority in agreement, so it doesn’t matter if two more owners said yes or no, it would either then be 5-0 or 3-2, and I only vouched a vacant spot because I was the one who called for this vote, so it would either then be 6-0 or 4-2, so it wouldn’t even matter in the first place, because the majority of the party agreed already. It doesn’t matter if the LEADER says no either, because like a PRESIDENT, you can vouch NO, but everyone else in your cabinet in the majority says YES and it gets passed anyway. Nobody is above the rules, and nobody is above democracy. Whether it is liked or not, the call still stands and you can’t really force an overturn because people already agreed in majority in the first place. Had it. Same song.