a=zero: 0⁕0≠0, (-0)^2={(-0)^2}/{(-0)^2} ramifies 0=0/0 implies -0=(-0)/(-0) falsely because -0 is not stupendously subsequenced

this will require i=-1 since 0/0=-1 & -0/-0=- where we can equate the these at an infinite power (0/0)^∞=(-0/-0)^∞⇒(-1)^∞=(i)^∞ such that these themselves to zero power (-1/-1)^0=(i/i)^0 is true. if rearranged it would have been (i/-1)^(0/∞)=(i/-1)^(0/∞) is true and hence the denominators slightly less that infinite root than the infinite root of the numerator provides (∞-1)/∞=(∞-1)/∞. yet if we take both sides time infinity and then have infinity over infinity factor on ones side we can get (∞-1)/∞=1+{(∞-1)/∞}/∞ & ∞⁕{(∞-1)/∞}-{(∞-1)/∞}⁕(∞/∞) = ∞⁕{(∞-1)/∞}-{(∞-1)/∞} then over tracking ∞⁕{(∞-1)/∞}-{1-(∞-1)/∞}/∞} = ∞⁕{(∞-1)/∞}-{(∞-1)/∞} eventually ∞⁕{(∞-1)/∞}-1= ∞⁕{(∞-1)/∞} so 1+{(∞-1)/∞}/∞-1/∞=(∞-1)/∞ also
1+1/∞+{(∞-1)/∞}/∞=(∞-1)/∞ also (∞-1/∞)/∞+{(∞-1)/∞}/∞=(∞-1)/∞ there 2⁕(∞-1/∞)=∞⁕(∞-1)/∞ there meaning our equation above was really {1+(∞-1)/∞}/∞⁕{(∞-1)/∞}=(∞-1)/∞ or {(∞-1)/∞+[(∞-1)/∞}^2]/∞=(∞-1)/∞ or or {∞⁕(∞-1)/∞+[(∞-1)/∞}^2]=∞⁕(∞-1)/∞ or [(∞-1)/∞}^2]=∞⁕(∞-1)/∞ or 2⁕∞⁕(∞-1)/∞}^3=∞2⁕∞⁕(∞-1)/∞^3 and finally r (∞-1)/∞}^2=(∞-1)/∞^3/(∞-1)/∞ very lastly r (∞-1)/∞}^2=(∞-1)/∞^6/(∞-1)/∞ very r (∞-1)/∞}^2=(∞-1)/∞^5 very very (∞-1)/∞}=(∞-1)/∞4 very (∞-1)/∞}^(1/2)=(∞-1)/∞4/^2 very aOR OBVIOUSLY A BEST SKETCHBTO GUIDEBBETTERPLAY

i⁕(∞-1)/∞=(∞-1)/∞

AND NO MS_MEMER_GROUP WE ARE NOT SENILE WE ARE JUST EFFORTING IN A WAYBTHATBTAXES OUR MINDBTO ITS LIMIT!!!

These really are a garbled recall of an hour or so of mentally deriving much more studiously, elegantly, and with care to verify every step. To the same result based on insight in middle of night about equations providing a narrative between ▣0^0▣ & ▣i▣ axiomatized. It would be a shame to not share at all just cause some of the share was gorgeous -the meme- some of it was a mess -the comment- and some was all we need to know -OP title.

Of course there's been a significant advance daily in the clarity of the paradigm with always original areas of theoreming taking hours themselves. Only a fraction of these are shared in any form. In short we are useless.

And lastly calling theses sketches, sketches is an insult to mathematicians. What I sometime rarely do on occasion is imagine I am making a sports achievement one day. To make those goals actual sports stars train over and over and over. So I'm going to try to believe that whatever is not done mentally -which is elegant f-ing around- or is not shared in a final form aka in a tournament (of publishing) is me conditioning myself. I am presently The Conditioner of a re-paradigmming of math!

5th for cause